Matt Gaetz and Denver Riggleman III: The Craven and the Courageous

Back in the day, Massachusetts Representative Barney Frank’s congressional colleagues and writers at The Hill regularly voted him as being both the brightest AND the funniest member of the House. And this, despite the fact that Barney was far to the left of most Democrats and virtually every Republican . . . not to mention being one of the few proudly “out” gay members of that body.

Today, it’s anybody’s guess who would be voted the best and brightest in the lower chamber; Maryland’s Jamie Raskin? California’s Adam Schiff?  Florida’s Ted Deutch?  Who knows?  By the same token, the one member of the House who has the lowest rating among both Democrats and Republicans when it comes to collegiality, sincerity, honesty and professionalism is, without a doubt, North Florida’s Matt Gaetz, who as of the past several days, has become front-page news all over the country . . . so much so that even Saturday Night Live assigned one of its cast members, Pete Davidson, to skewer the  hyper-conservative Tallahassee blowhard in prime time. 

For those who have been vacationing on Uranus (pun likely intended), Representative Graetz is reportedly being investigated by the U.S. Justice Department over numerous allegations; the most oft-mentioned being that he had a sexual relationship with a 17-year-old girl and paid for her travel, which would be a violation of what at one time was called the “Mann Act.” 

(n.b. A word about the Mann Act: Passed by Congress in June 1910, the Mann Act was named after its primary author, Illinois Representative James R. Mann. The act invoked the Commerce Clause to felonize the use of interstate or foreign commerce to transport women for immoral purposes. The Act was aimed at prostitution, immorality, and human trafficking. Congress appointed a commission three years before its passage to investigate into the problem of immigrant prostitutes. It was alleged that immigrant women were brought to America for sexual slavery and immigrant men lured American girls into prostitution (or “white slavery”). Over the years it was in effect, it was used to arrest such well-known people as African-American boxer Jack Johnson (arrested and convicted in 1913, pardoned by Donald J. Trump in 2018; architect Frank Lloyd Wright (arrested, tried and acquitted in 1926 - charges eventually dropped; Charles Chaplin (arrested, tried and acquitted in 1944); and musician Chuck Barry (arrested, tried and found guilty in 1960 - served 3 years in prison). The most famous history of the early days of this act was written shortly after its passage by the “notorious” anarchist Emma Goldman in 1910. She herself would be deported during the 1919 Palmer Raids aboard the “Soviet Ark” ).

Now, before anyone gets on the “it’s all the fault of the liberal Democratic establishment and the lame-stream media" bandwagon, please know that the investigation began during the Trump Administration where A.G. Bill Barr was still calling the shots.  Gaetz responded to the DOJ allegations alleging that he was the victim of a former Justice Department official seeking a $25 million extortion payment.  "We have been cooperating with federal authorities in this matter, and my father has even been wearing a wire at the FBI’s direction to catch these criminals," Gaetz wrote on his Facebook account. With every passing day the story gets seedier, more complex and less credible, the potential charges ever more damning. 

This past week CNN reported that Gaetz showed other Republican legislators nude photos and videos of women he claimed to have had sex with; he showed the photos while on the floor of the House chamber. Charges have also surfaced that Gaetz once led a group of Republican legislators in a game where they scored “points” for sleeping with staffers and interns—with bonus points for virgins—also resurfaced last week. Though this was not the first time. Or the second. Or even the third. 

 As of this past weekend, he is being investigated for whether or not he dipped into either campaign or Congressional office funds to pay for this and other alleged trysts. Then too there is a sidebar about Gaetz’s involvement with his new 26-year old fiancée Ginger Luckey (they became engaged at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Club this past December) and her brother, 28-year old Palmer Luckey, a big name in the tech world who is currently seeking government defense contracts for his company (Anduril . . . named for a sword in J.,R.R. Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings trilogy) to build weaponized drones, thus taking the industry lead away from the Chinese.  It turns out that Rep. Gaetz has already sponsored legislation to ban federal funds from being used to purchase Chinese drones.  The measure did not pass. 

In light of the initial interest in the “sex-with-a-minor-for-hire” charge, one of the most chilling and ironic things to emerge is that Gaetz, the well-heeled scion of a longtime political family (his father, the onetime president of the Florida Senate sold Vitas Healthcare Corporation business for a reported half billion dollars in 2004; his grandfather Jerry Gaetz ran for Lt. Gov. of North Dakota in 1964) the irony turned out to be that Matt Gaetz cast the lone vote against a bill (S.1536) aimed at combating human trafficking.  In defending his vote against the bill - officially  known as the “Combating Human Trafficking in Commercial Vehicles Act,” (which creates a committee within the Department of Transportation to develop “best practices for states and transportation groups to combat human trafficking”) Gaetz defended his vote in a Facebook broadcast averring that “despite the best intentions of the bill,” it represented "mission creep" at the federal level in creating the committee.

He further stated “Unless there is an overwhelming, compelling reason that our existing agencies in the federal government can't handle that problem, I vote no because voters in Northwest Florida did not send me to Washington to go and create more federal government . . . . If anything, we should be abolishing a lot of the agencies at the federal level like the Department of Education, like the EPA and sending that power back to our state governments." 

There is a pathetic irony at work here. In recent weeks, practically every well known official in the New York state Democratic Party, and not a few national figures, have called upon New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo to resign following allegations of sexual harassment. As of forty-eight hours ago, the number of Republican officials calling for the resignation of Rep. Matt Gaetz since it was revealed he is under investigation stands at … zero. How in the world does this fit in with political tribe that refers to itself as “the party of family values?” Somehow they’ve managed to forgive and forget the sins of such party stalwarts as Newt Gingrich and Donald Trump while piling on - not to mention impeaching - Bill Clinton for his indiscretions.

Unquestionably, Matt Gaetz’s chances of being reelected are looking rather slim. It also seems to me that are at least four possible scenarios hovering about the future of this craven “son-of-Trump”

• He will resign office and become a media commentator . . . perhaps at NewsmaxTV or One America News (he has already hinted at this);

• He will face a tangle of well-heeled conservatives in the 2022 Republican primary and either lose or face a run-off;

• He will be expelled from the House of Representatives;

• He will face trial on who knows how many charges.

Regardless of what scenario takes center stage, one can only hope  that justice shall be done.

So much for the craven Matt Gaetz.  Let’s briefly turn our attention to the courageous Denver Riggleman III.  Denver who?  Riggleman (1970- ) a Virginia Republican, served but a single term in Congress (January 3, 2019-January 3, 2021), representing Virginia’s 5th District.  He was/is a mostly conservative (e.g. non-hard right) Republican who served 15 years as an intelligence officer in the United States Airforce, created, along with his wife, Christine Blair and 3 daughters, a 50-acre craft distillery in Afton, Virginia (outside of Charlottesville) called “Silverback Distillery.”  Former Representative Riggleman is not your typical Republican politician.  He is a longtime self-described “Bigfoot scholar” and, although he doesn’t necessarily believe in its existence, self-published a 2020 book entitled Bigfoot… It’s Complicated.  In July 2019 he officiated at the same-sex marriage of 2 friends; the next month he was censured by Republican Party officials who claimed that he had  “abandoned party principles.”  Riggleman was defeated after serving but a single term by Bob Good, a former associate athletic director at Liberty University . . . aptly described as a “reTrumplican.”  

But it wasn’t officiating at the marriage, owning and operating a distillery or his fascination with Bigfoot that got party officials to run and fund Bob Good; it was the fact that Denver Riggleman III showed uncommon valor on the floor of the House of Representatives.  No, it was having the guts to be the lone Republican House member to speak in favor of the passage of H.Res. 1154, a resolution “Condemning QAnon and rejecting the conspiracy theories it promotes.”  In speaking to his House colleagues about the threat of QAnon, then-Rep. Riggleman said, ““The grotesque nature of the tweets and Instagram posts and the anti-Semitic tripe spewed by QAnon adherents should cause concern for everyone . . . .  [The] death threats Tom Malinowski (D-NJ - the resolution’s main sponsor) received were a surprise and a shock,. This type of behavior is easily condemned.”  And for his courageous stance, Riggleman lost his seat. 

But that is not the end of Denver Riggleman’s involvement in the public arena.  He is now working for a group of prominent experts and academics at the Network Contagion Research Institute, which studies the spread of disinformation in American politics and how to thwart it. The group has undertaken several extensive investigations into how extremists have used propaganda and faked information to sow division over some of the most contentious issues of the day, like the coronavirus pandemic and police violence. Their reports have also given lawmakers a better understanding of the QAnon belief system and other radical ideologies that helped fuel the riot at the Capitol on Jan. 6.  Three cheers for this former Republican who at one point belonged to the House Freedom Caucus and actually supported Donald Trump for President in 2016.

Being a craven blowhard like Matt Gaetz might be ego-fulfilling and sexually exciting; being a courageous public servant like Denver Riggleman III can lead to political dismemberment.  All things considered, I’ll take the latter over the former every day of the year.

 Copyright©2021 Kurt F. Stone

In Every Generation . . .

   Theodore Roberts as Moses in “The Ten Commandments” (1923)

The second Stone family seder will begin in about 7 hours. It will be a smallish affair, yet far less technically challenging than last year’s “Matzah via Zoom.” At the end - after a flood of stories, prayers, the opening of the front door for Elijah the Prophet, and tons of food and wine - we will all say לְשָנָה הַבָאָה בִירוּשָלָיִם (“Next year in Jerusalem”) and then expand that tradition by adding something new:  וְגָם פָּנִים אֶל פָּנִים  (“And also, face-to-face”). Indeed, we have come a long-long way since last year. And thanks to the miracle of modern medicine we’re getting ever closer (both literally and figuratively) to putting a healthy muzzle on that which has enslaved us . . . i.e. COVID19.    To me, the two most important passages in the seder have always been:         

     .שֶבְכָׇל־דּוֹר וָדוֹר עוֹמְדִים עָלֵינוּ לְכַלּוֹתֵינוּ וְהַקָדוֹשׁ בָרוּךְ הוּא מַצִילֵנוּ מִיָדָם.                                                                                                                     

                                                                                                            (In every generation it is incumbent upon each of us to see                                                                                                                                       ourselves as if we had been freed from Egypt) and:                                                                                   

                                                                      שֶבְכָׇל־דּוֹר וָדוֹר עוֹמְדִים עָלֵינוּ לְכַלּוֹתֵינוּ וְהַקָדוֹשׁ בָרוּךְ הוּא מַצִילֵנוּ מִיָדָם.

                        (“In every generation they stand up against us to destroy us, but the Blessed Holy One redeems us from their  hands.”)
                                                                         

 This year, these overarching lessons are of far greater importance than at any time in recent memory . . . and not just in a specifically Jewish sense. For this year we are being beset by innumerable “pharaohs” seeking to “enslave” us such tyrannies as assault weapons and assaults on voting rights, as well as racism and gross economic inequality.

Let’s start with the last first: According to the latest available statistics, the average CEO of a Fortune 500 company earned $21.3 million last year. This means it would take a worker earing minimum wage for 40 hours a week, 52 weeks a year and working, on average, for 50 years, 13 lifetimes to earn as much as his or her boss makes in a single year (and that’s if the minimum wage were $15.00/hour).

So far as the tyranny of assault weapons and assaults on voting rights, more and more states are enacting more diabolically disabling legislation in order to ensure that fewer and fewer Americans of color, students and retirees will be able to vote. These disabling mechanisms include cutting back on the weeks and hours that voting places can be open; outlawing voting on Sunday and putting stumbling blocks in the path of voting by mail. In this manner, they (the mostly Republican pharaohs) hope to keep their state houses and legislatures filled with those who are at the beck and call of lobbying groups like the National Rifle Association and deep-pocketed, conspiracy-minded conservatives, whose interests begin with scaring the daylights out of average Americans and end in lying with virtual impunity about the threat of a war against Christianity, capitalism and morality.  Of course, what truly scares the daylights out of them is America becoming a minority/majority country.

That is largely why Republicans in 43 states have now introduced 253 voter suppression bills since Donald Trump’s Big Lie spurred the January 6 insurrection at the Capitol. As but one example of this, just the other day (a mere 48 hours after the mass shooting in Boulder, Colorado, the Texas legislature passed SB7 which would limit extended early voting hours, prohibit drive-thru voting and allow partisan poll watchers to record voters who receive help filling out their ballots. It would also forbid local election officials from encouraging voters to fill out applications to vote by mail, even if they qualify.

Then there’s the Georgia legislature,  whose bill - SB 202 - just became law. This anti-democratic  voter suppression bill gives Georgia state officials the lawful right and power to overrule county election boards, imposes new voter identification requirements for absentee ballots, empowers state officials to take over local elections boards, limits the use ballot drop boxes and makes it a crime to approach voters in line to give them food and water. It was this last clause (the one about making it a crime to pass out bottles of water to prospective voters standing in the hot sun brings to mind the scene in both versions of Cecil B. DeMille’s The Ten Commandments (1923’s starring Theodore Roberts and 1956’s starring Charlton Heston) . . . it was this clause that brought to mind Moses’ and Aaron’s sister Miriam (Estelle Taylor in 1923 and Olive Deering in 1956) tenderly giving water to dying Hebrew slaves as they toiled in the broiling sun.  Seems to me that those Republicans who overwhelmingly voted for this law haven’t got a heart . . . and likely never read the Hebrew Bible.

And speaking of the Hebrew Bible (that’s “Old Testament” to non-Jews), during hearings by the U.S. Senate Rules and Administration Committee on the “For the People Act”, which would expand voting rights, Mississippi Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith informed Senator Chuck Schumer that there shouldn’t be any voting on Sunday. Holding up a dollar bill, she condescendingly told the Senate Majority Leader (who is Jewish and a senior member of the committee) “You know this is our currency, this is a dollar bill. This says, ‘The United States of America . . . In God We Trust.’ Etched in stone in the U.S. Senate chamber is ‘In God We Trust.’ When you swore in all of these witnesses, the last thing you said to them in your instructions was, ‘so help you God.’ In God’s word in Exodus 20:18. it says remember the Sabbath, and keep it holy. So that is my response to Senator Schumer.” Schumer, along with Senators Dianne Feinstein and the newly-elected Jon Osoff - the 3 Jewish members of that committee -  were somewhere between bemused and flabbergasted; they refused to inform their colleague of the obvious . . . that in the Hebrew Bible, the Sabbath is on Saturday, not Sunday. Instead, they let the media go after Senator Hyde-Smith with everything they had.

The modern-day pharaohs are doing their utmost to enslave Americans by either blaming others for problems which do not truly exist (such as ridding elections of corruption and chaos where provably there is little to none) or scaring the daylights out of otherwise decent people (“Ban assault-style weapons today and they’ll come and take away all our guns tomorrow”).  Some of their arguments are beyond belief.  Here’s Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) equating gun violence with drunk driving: “I’m not trying to perfectly equate these two but, we have a lot of drunk drivers in America that kill a lot of people. We ought to try to combat that, too. But I think what many folks on my side of the aisle are saying is that the answer is not to get rid of all sober drivers. I don’t believe we have a gun control problem in America, I believe we have an idiot control problem.”  Perhaps he should look in the mirror . . . or at his side of the Senate chamber . . .

Then there is Pharaoh Ted Cruz who warns that no kind of background check will ever stem the tide of gun violence: "Every time there’s a shooting, we play this ridiculous theater, where this committee (Senate Judiciary) gets together and proposes a bunch of laws that would do nothing to stop these murders.”  And what is his suggestion for what can be done to reduce our staggering levels of mass shootings?  “Make sure even more people are armed and can protect themselves and their families.”

The Haggadah speaks the truth when it reminds us that “In every generation they rise up against us,” and further admonishes each of us to hold fast to the memory that “we were slaves in the land of Egypt.” It is a universal message.

What to do about the latest claque of pharaohs is hard to fathom. Oh sure, we could all wait for the Holy Blessed One to bring us out of the newest forms of slavery. But that is not enough. We must work as one to remove all the pharaohs from their thrones of gold.

Along with our hard work, might I suggest a bit of humor to boot:

Let’s treat guns like cars. Do remember that while he sat on the throne, Pharaoh Trump told members of the NRA that “Cars kill people, and if we’re going to outlaw guns, then we will have to outlaw all cars.”

So here’s a proposal to treat guns like automobiles:

• Title and tag at each point of sale;

• Mandated gun training;

• Written tests;

• Practical tests;

• Health requirements;

• Proof of liability insurance and annual renewals and

• Inspections each year.

And, as a further proposal which links guns to voting:

• You can only purchase one gun every two years;

• It can only be on a Tuesday;

• You must go and wait in line;

• There is only one place in your county, regardless of its geographic size or population;

• You must have multiple forms of I.D.

• No one can give you water while you wait in line.

  And with these thoughts my friends, please excuse me while I go and unlock the front door'; in every generation we do this in order to make sure that Elijah the Prophet can enter with the news that once again, we’ve fought back against the Pharaohs and consigned them to what we call גֵיהִנוֹם . . . namely, “Hell.”

Wishing one and all a thoughtful, tasty and energizing Pesach as well as a peaceful and awe-inspiring Easter,

Copyright©2021 Kurt F. Stone

The Talking Cure

                        Dr. Sigmund Freud (1856-1939)

Anyone who has spent even a bit of time learning about the history of Freudian psychoanalysis, is familiar with the term “The talking cure.” In a nutshell, the good Dr. Freud was speaking with a colleague of his, Dr. Josef Breuer one day and Breuer told Freud about a patient he called “Anna O” (in reality, Bertha Pappenheim), who was experiencing “hysteria.” Breuer excitedly told Freud he had discovered that if he hypnotized Anna, she'd reveal all sorts of information she didn't recall when she was conscious — and her symptoms would lessen afterward. Freud tried this “talking cure” in his own private practice, but found patients would talk pretty freely to him without hypnosis, provided they were in a relaxed position — specifically, lying down on a couch — and if they were encouraged to say whatever came into their heads, a process known as “free association.” Once a patient talked at length, Freud could analyze what the person said to figure out what past traumas were likely causing the patient's current distress. Thus was born Freud’s “Talking Cure.” It was a boon to the nascent world  of psychoanalysis . . . not to mention the sale of couches!

As important as the Talking Cure has been to  psychoanalysis, one must keep in mind that it is not - nor ever has been - a panacea; sometimes it works, sometimes it does not. Let’s just say that it can be a valuable arrow in Freud’s quiver.

The United States Senate has its own version of the Talking Cure - a tradition which occasionally offers a helping hand to those in the minority, but frequently acts as a political hindrance or impediment to those in the majority.  Here, of course, we are referring to one of the most nettlesome of all legislative strategies: the filibuster.   

Likely stemming from the Dutch /ˈvrɛi̯bœy̯tər/ meaning either a “freebooter” or “a pirate,” the Senate website defines filibuster as “An Informal term for any attempt to block or delay Senate action on a bill or other matter by debating it at length, by offering numerous procedural motions, or by any other delaying or obstructive actions."  The term filibuster was first used in the 1850s when it was applied to efforts to hold the Senate floor in order to prevent a vote on a bill. In the early years of Congress, representatives, as well as senators, could filibuster bills. However, as the number of representatives grew, the House amended its rules placing specific time limits on debates. In the 100-member Senate, unlimited debate continued on the grounds that any senator should have the right to speak as long as necessary on any issue. Prior to 1917 the Senate rules did not provide for a way to end debate and force a vote on a measure. That year, the Senate adopted a rule to allow a two-thirds majority to end a filibuster, a procedure known as "cloture." In 1975 the Senate reduced the number of votes required for cloture from two-thirds (67) to three-fifths (60) of the 100-member Senate.

                James Stewart in “Mr. Smith Goes  to Washington” (1939)

For non-political geeks, the greatest exemplar of the term filibuster is Jimmy Stewart playing the young idealistic Senator Jefferson  Smith holding the Senate floor hour after hour so as to keep a handful of his more corrupt colleagues from destroying his dream - creating a national boys’ camp.  Most will recall the hoarse, reeling Smith collapsing on the Senate floor after setting some sort of record for “talking the bill to death.”  In reality, this is a tactic which actually did exist: the “talking filibuster.”  The all-time record for the longest filibuster of ‘em all belongs to the late South Carolina Senator Strom Thurmond, who  spoke for 24 hours and 18 minutes against the Civil Rights Act of 1957, according to U.S. Senate records.

Thurmond began speaking at 8:54 p.m. on Aug. 28 and continued until 9:12 p.m. the following evening, reciting the Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, President George Washington's farewell address and other historical documents along the way.  So long as he stayed on his feet, it  really didn’t matter what he spoke about. Using what might be called a “tag-team” strategy, Thurmond and several of his colleagues (all Southern Democrats) managed to hold the floor for an amazing 57 days (March 26 -June 19), the day the Civil Rights Act of 1957 passed.  Among the other filibuster champs, several were, believe it or not, progressives: Wisconsin Senators William La Follette, Sr. (18 hours, 28 minutes in 1908) and William Proxmire (16 hours and 12 minutes) who managed to stall debate on an increase of the public debt ceiling in 1981 and Oregon’s Wayne Morse (the “Tiger of the Senate”) who spoke for 22 hours and 26 minutes to stall debate on the Tidelands Oil bill in 1953.

Today, the “talking filibuster” is a remnant of the past.  Just calling for a filibuster on a given bill (most always by the minority party) makes it possible to stall legislative activity against a particular bill while continuing to be in session.  In 2003, Senate Democrats threatened a lengthy filibuster to block several of then-President George W. Bush’s nominees. Republicans discussed invoking the parliamentary move since, like a nuclear explosion, it cannot be controlled once it is unleashed. Former GOP Senate Majority leader Trent Lott coined the term “the Nuclear Option” because both parties saw it as an unthinkable final recourse, just like nuclear war. During a standoff over George W. Bush nominees in 2003, Republicans discussed invoking the parliamentary move by using the codeword “The Hulk" since it, like the superhero alter ego, cannot be controlled once it is unleashed. Senators who wanted to give the maneuver a more positive public image, call it “The Constitutional Option.”

Well, now that Democrats and Republicans are living and working in an equally divided Senate (where only V.P. Harris can break a tie), the idea of minority Republicans reverting to the filibuster has both sides wondering what to do.  Some - mostly the progressive left - want to get rid of the filibuster altogether; others want to go back to the days when cloture requires 60 votes; then there is President Biden, Majority Leader Schumer, his assistant, Illinois Senator Dick Durbin, and  the so-called “institutionalists.”  They realize that they simply do not have the votes to change Senate rules (it only takes a majority vote).

If the Democrats managed to end the filibuster (as of today, they don’t have the votes) the first thing they would no doubt do is pass their voting rights bill, (S.1), which would counteract curbs Republicans are placing on mail-in and absentee voting, streamline national voter registration and end the partisan drawing of congressional lines. Voting rights activist Stacey Abrams has argued Democrats could possibly get around the filibuster for this one bill. But most people agree that once a party ends the filibuster for one bill, it'll be hooked and do it again and again.

President Biden is likely the lynchpin in this debate. He was a senator for decades and respects the institution, but he's now a president trying to get things done. Biden told ABC's George Stephanopoulos just the other day he'd like to revert to a "talking filibuster."

"I don't think that you have to eliminate the filibuster, you have to do it [like] what it used to be when I first got to the Senate back in the old days," he told Stephanopoulos. "You had to stand up and command the floor, you had to keep talking."

"So you're for that reform? You're for bringing back the talking filibuster?" Stephanopulos asked.

"I am. That's what it was supposed to be," Biden said, a la "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington."

There is already quite a significant debate over whether or not returning to the “Jefferson Smith” version of the filibuster will solve anything.  Shortly after the president’s sit-down with George Stephanopoulos, CNN political analyst Chris Cillizza wrote an analysis piece flatly stating that A 'talking filibuster' isn't going to solve the Senate's problems.”  Only time will tell.

I personally agree with the POTUS and a growing cadre of Democrats. By going back to the old rule, it would force Republicans to remain on their feet in front of all those cameras, showing themselves to the American public for what they are; obstructionists whose main issue is being against anything and everything the Democrats are for.  Period.  It would b e easy enough to change one aspect of the filibuster rule: mandating that all speechifying must be germane to the topic at hand. In other words, no more reading from the Bible, the White Pages, or Dr. Seuss’ Green Eggs and Ham (as Ted Cruz actually did in September 2013).

Which brings us back to Dr. Freud who, although unbelievably gifted and insightful, was by no means political.  Nonetheless, he did understand the mind, heart and soul of the politician Fpr indeed, here are his thoughts:

“The challenge of leadership is to be strong, but not rude; be kind, but not weak; be bold, but not bully; be thoughtful, but not lazy; be humble, but not timid; be proud, but not arrogant; have humor, but without folly.” 

Can we talk?

Copyright©2021 Kurt F. Stone

My Friend Marvin: the Once and Former Conservative Republican

More than 20 years ago, when I was dividing my time between Harvard’s Widener Library, Williams College’s Sawyer Library and the Library of Congress doing research on what would turn out to be the first of two books on the history of the Jews of Congress, someone - now long forgotten - sent me an email asking if I was aware that Oklahoma Republican Mickey Edwards likely came from a Jewish background. And so, dropping everything, I spent a considerable amount of time looking into this conservative Republican’s family history. It turned out that indeed, Mickey Edwards (née Marvin Henry Yarnovsky) was and is a former Jewish member of Congress who was born in Cleveland, Ohio in 1937, the son of Isidore, the orphaned son of Polish immigrants and Rosalie, whose family had changed their name to Miller, and was the daughter of Lithuanians. Mickey would eventually move with his family from Cleveland to the southside Capitol Hill section of Oklahoma City, where his father, (now called “Eddie Edwards”), managed a shoe store. Mickey has long said that were he to have remained in Cleveland, he likely would have turned out a liberal Democrat.

Mickey eventually earned a degree in journalism, graduated from law school and was elected to Congress, where he became a leading Republican. During his 16 years (1977-1993) in Congress, he served variously on the House Budget and Appropriations committees and was the ranking member of the Appropriations Subcommittee on Foreign Operations. He was also a member of the House Republican leadership, serving as the chairman of the House Republican Policy Committee, the party's fourth-ranking leadership position, He also helped found the Federalist Society and was one of the leading lights of the American Conservative Union.

Once leaving Congress, Mickey, a truly intelligent, well educated man, went into academia, where he spent more than a decade teaching at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, then working as a Lecturer of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University's Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, and as a member of the Princeton Project on National Security. He taught courses on "How to Win Elections" and "Congress and the Constitution." To this day, he is also a Vice President of the Aspen Institute, and Director of the Aspen Institute-Rodel Fellowships in Public Leadership. In 2013 Mickey was appointed a National Constitution Center – Penn Law Visiting Fellow. But to me, what is most telling is that he gave up his affiliation with conservative Republicanism and eventually left the party altogether.. Why? Because he could no longer abide with the cultish nature (read: pro-Trump) of the G.O.P. In a radio interview on Fresh Air with Terry Gross, Edwards said that he had voted for Barack Obama in the 2008 general election. He endorsed Joe Biden in 2020 and left the Republican Party after the storming of the United States Capitol on January 6 of this year.

In another interview with KFOR, an NBC-affiliated station in Oklahoma City, Edwards said he could not understand how even after Republican, Trump-supporting governors and legislators confirmed it was a fair election, members of Congress continued to call it into question.

“The members of Congress knew better. They knew better. [Oklahoma Senator James] Lankford knew better. Members of the house delegation knew better,” Edwards said. “They knew the results, they had the information. They saw that it was Republican Trump supporters all across the country who were saying, ‘no, we lost.” He simply could no longer lend his name or talents to a Republican party that was devoid of values, issues or morality. “This has become a cult. It’s no longer a political party. It’s a cult. It’s the kind of a cult that when the leader of the cult does anything, no matter what it is, or how awful it is, they voted,” Edwards said. “They voted to question the election results even after people came into the Capitol, tried to kill them and killed a police officer who was trying to protect them. And they did that.”-

Now mind you, these are the words, sentiments and political actions not of what used to be referred to as a “Rockefeller Republican,” or even today’s far more conservation incarnation - a so-called “moderate” Republican - but rather, as mentioned above, a former member of Congress who was a founding trustee of the Heritage Foundation, national chairman of the American Conservative Union and at one time chaired the House Republican Policy Committee. In other words, this is a party which welcomes the loony likes of Senators Ted Cruz (TX) and Rand Paul (KY) and Josh Hawley (MO), or Representatives Marjorie Taylor Greene (GA-14), Madison Cawthorn (NC-11), Matt Gaetz (FL-1) or Lauren Boebert (C0-3); it has no place for a legislator/thinker like Mickey.

I call Mickey every once in a while just to see how he is doing, get in a bit of mutual kvetching, and dream dreams about the future.

While we’re at it, let’s get a few things straight:

• First and foremost, the Republican Party, far from being a political party in the historic sense of the term, is a full-blown cult which cares not a whit or farthing about what a majority of voting citizens support or desire, but mostly what their cult leader supports or desires.

• Second, more and more, Republicans are far more easily identified by what they are against than what they are for. They are against abortion, gun safety legislation, taxation, federal spending (on anything but tax cuts) and all Democrats (from AOC and Bernie Sanders to Krysten Sinema and Joe Manchin) . . . whom they want all Americans to believe are nothing more than a toxic gang of traitorous Communists bent on the utter destruction of this country

• Third, that besides taking back the White House and Congress from the hands of these “Communists,” they are only concerned with the money and the votes of quickly fading white Christian majority. And if to keep said majority they must put electoral stumbling blocks in front of all Democrats - suburban housewives, African-Americans, Hispanics, Asian-Americans, college students and the elderly - so be it.

To my way of thinking and understanding, this is not a winning strategy; it is a blueprint for a dangerously divided America. Think about this:

• Despite the fact that more than 70% of the American public supported passage of the $1.9 trillion COVID-19 stimulus package, not a single Republican in either the House or Senate voted in its favor.

• Despite the fact that the vast majority of Republican legislators want to see Roe v. Wade overturned by the Supreme Court, a majority of Americans (61%) continue to say that abortion should be legal in all cases (27%) or most (34%) cases. A smaller share of the public (38%) says abortion should be illegal in all (12%) or most cases (26%).

• Six percent more Americans say they were in favor of their senators voting to convict former President Donald Trump during the Senate impeachment trial than in his previous trial, according to a new poll. In the poll, conducted by Gallup, 52 percent of Americans said they were in favor of convicting Trump, while 45 percent said they' were in favor of their senators voting against conviction. And yet, when the final vote was taken on February 13, 2021, only 7 Republican senators voted in favor of conviction — and they are now on the former president’s “hit list” - Republicans whom he has sworn to see destroyed due to their lack of loyalty.

Is this any prescription for future electoral success?

Unlike many partisan Democrats I speak with on an almost daily basis, I do not wish to see the GOP disappear.  Any political system that relies on but a single political party to get things done is a system headed towards the land of autocracy.  For myself, I greatly prefer a two-party system in which both major parties campaign on – and can fully explain and justify – what they are for and what they are against.  A political system which exists only on what one party proclaims – and frequently in dishonest terms – what the other side is against, is none too healthy.

In other words, a system which cannot find a place for the likes of my friend Marvin is in deep trouble.  As always, I wish him well, pray for his health and energy, and wish him many, many more years of helping bring healing to his former party . . .  you know, the one created by a guy named Abe? I think I’ll dial him (Marvin, not Abe) tomorrow . . .

Copyright©2021 Kurt F. Stone

March 7, 1965

Fifty-six years ago today (March 7, 1965) the then 25-year old civil rights activist John Lewis (1940-2020) led over 600 marchers across the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, Alabama and faced brutal attacks by oncoming state troopers. Lewis himself was one of 18 who were injured badly enough to require hospitalization. Footage of the violence collectively shocked the nation and galvanized the fight against racial injustice. In response, civil rights leaders planned to take their cause directly to Alabama Governor George Wallace on a 54-mile march from Selma to the state capital of Montgomery. Although Wallace ordered state troopers “to use whatever measures are necessary to prevent a march,” approximately 600 voting rights advocates set out from the Brown Chapel AME Church on Sunday, March 7.

In the wake of the shocking incident, President Lyndon Johnson called for comprehensive voting rights legislation. In a speech to a joint session of Congress on March 15, 1965, the president outlined the devious ways in which election officials denied African American citizens the vote.

Within days, the number of people participating in the march - whose ultimate destination was Montgomery - had grown to more than 25,000.  Now led by John Lewis, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., and Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel, the horrific event which began on “Bloody Sunday” galvanized the nation.  So much so that Congress passed - and President Lyndon Johnson signed the “Voting Rights Act” on August 6 . . . a mere 5 months after “Bloody Sunday."  The purpose of this act was to overcome legal barriers at the state and local levels that prevented African Americans from exercising their right to vote as guaranteed under the 15th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The Voting Rights Act is considered one of the most far-reaching pieces of civil rights legislation in U.S. history.

Unfortunately, over the past several years, governors, state legislators and members of Congress (overwhelmingly Republican) have been doing everything in their power to undo or reverse the Voting Rights Act. The majority of those seeking this reversal are motivated by pretty much the same concern: putting as many stumbling blocks in the path of poor and minority voters, a sizeable percentage of who regularly vote for Democrats. Most readers of The K.F. Stone Weekly know that there are important aspects of voting which are protected by the 15h Amendment which in sum states that “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States, or by any State, on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.” Nonetheless, many state legislatures - especially those under Republican control - have been, as mentioned above - been putting significant roadblocks before the rights of minority voters.

Today, in memory and honor of the 56th anniversary of “Bloody Sunday,” President Biden has signed an executive order to promote additional access to voting. The administration describes the executive order as an “initial step” to protect voting rights — one that uses “the authority the president has to leverage federal resources to help people register to vote and provide information,” according to an administration official. This move comes not just in memory of “Bloody Sunday,” but also as a strong response to Republicans in statehouses around the country who are doing everything in their power to advance voter suppression legislation, including a bill in Georgia that voting rights groups say targets Black voters. Congressional Democrats, meanwhile, have pushed measures in recent days to increase voting rights, including HR1 -- a sweeping ethics and election package that contains provisions expanding early and mail-in voting, restoring voting rights to former felons, permitting voting on Sunday, and easing voter registration for eligible Americans.

Despite the fact that the decisions of 60 separate courts and Donald Trump’s own Justice Department finding virtually no voting irregularities in the 2020 presidential election (the one which the previous president and his staunchest supporters claimed to be as true as the sun rising in the east and setting in the west) Republican lawmakers in 43 states have introduced 253 bills to restrict ballot access. The greatest activity has been in battleground states, especially Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Georgia. Measures involve early voting, mail-in ballots, drop boxes, mobile voting facilities, and rules to disqualify ballots received after Election Day that cannot be overruled by the executive branch or the courts.

Some restrictions, however, are likely to be adopted in states in which the GOP controls both the legislature and the governor’s mansion. The Iowa state senate recently passed a bill shortening the early voting period. Although Florida’s Gov. Ron DeSantis declared that his state “did it right” in November 2020, Florida is poised to reduce the number of drop boxes. Texas lawmakers have submitted a slew of bills limiting voter access.  This week, the Georgia House of Representatives passed a bill whose motive Gwinnett County Republican election official Alice O’Lenick acknowledged was partisan: If House Bill 531 is enacted “at least we have a shot at winning,” she said. The legislation mandates that all counties have the same early voting dates and times: Monday-Friday, during business hours, one mandatory Saturday, one additional Saturday or Sunday. The elimination of early voting in the evening and all but one Sunday is aimed directly at working class Georgians and “souls to polls” initiatives, which usher African Americans to polling places after Sunday morning church services.

An Iowa bill aimed at limiting voting and making it harder for voters to return absentee ballots is headed to Gov. Kim Reynolds' desk this week, after passing both Republican-controlled chambers of the state legislature.

The bill, introduced by a Republican state senator, specifically would reduce the number of early voting days from 29 days to 20 days. It would also close polling places an hour earlier on Election Day (at 8 p.m. instead of 9 p.m.).

The bill also places new restrictions on absentee voting including banning officials from sending applications without a voter first requesting one, and requiring ballots be received by the county before polls close on Election Day.

The Republican-controlled Iowa House passed the measure on Wednesday night in a party line vote of 57-37. That vote came a day after the GOP-controlled Iowa Senate, where the legislation was introduced, also passed the bill on a party line vote.

One attorney representing Arizona before the Supreme Court went so far as to admit that these changes and restrictions had virtually nothing to do with guaranteeing that elections could neither be stolen nor rigged: “We are pushing for these changes for they guarantee the success of Republicans in coming elections.”  If anyone needs a new definition of chutzpah, here it is . . .

So what can be done?” Can or will President Biden’s executive order regarding the 15th Amendment put a horse collar around the Republican-controlled states that wish to turn back the clock?  The only thing that comes to mind on this, the 56th anniversary of “Bloody Sunday” is for everyone to work just as hard to overturn their state legislatures and replace their governors as they/we did to get Joe Biden and Kamala Harris elected in 2020.  

In other words, there’s no rest for the weary.  We simply must keep the spirit of John Lewis and Bloody Sunday alive.

Any takers?  Please let me know.

Copyright©2012 Kurt F. stone

The Clone

Politically speaking, Florida is one of the strangest states in the nation. How so? Because while the farther north one goes in the 50 states, the more liberal/progressive the state tends to become. Likewise, the farther south one travels, the more conservatives you run into. Not so the “Golden State.” Here, the farther north one travels, the more politically southern it becomes. And for those of us who live in the southern-most part of the state (Palm Beach, Broward and Miami-Dade Counties) we bask in the land of Democrats and anti-Trumpers. The Jewish members of our Florida Congressional delegation (Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, Ted Deutsch, and Lois Frankel) all hale from the South, while the most ultra-conservative represent districts which abut Alabama and Georgia . . . in more ways than one.

Florida is a state with a lot of conservative political clout. Consider that among those giving serious thought about making a run for the Republican presidential nomination in 2024 - that is, presuming the former President isn’t spending the lion’s share of his time and presumed fortune in court - three (Senators Rick Scott and Marco Rubio as well as Governor Ron DeSantis) are generating a lot of publicity and dollars. In matter of fact, of the three, the 42-year old DeSantis garnered 21% (good for second place) in a straw poll of possible presidential candidates at this weekend’s Conservative Political Action Committee (CPAC) gathering held in Orlando.  (n.b. Donald Trump came in first with 55% of the vote, and both Rubio and Scott were in single figures.  Without Trump in the mix, DeSantis came in first with 43%, with South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem hauling in 11% for second place and Donald Trump, Jr., coming in third with 8%.)  And unlike politicos like Senators Rubio, Scott, Cruz and Graham, who all went from being targets of some of then-candidate Trump’s most scurrilous, obnoxious, opprobrious barbs and then became among his most ardent supporters, DeSantis has, generally speaking, been a Trump acolyte since day one. (I guess that since DeSantis went to Yale largely on the strength of his prowess as a baseball player [at one time he was captain of the varsity], that would make him Trump’s earliest and biggest “athletic supporter.”  LOL) 

Interestingly, though in his final House race in 2016, then-Rep. DeSantis ran mostly against Democrats and rarely - if ever - mentioned his support for The Donald . . . despite having been one of the very first members of Congress to endorse him.  However, once he became Governor of Florida in early January 2019, he began acting, sounding - even breathing - like a clone of America’s Tweeter-in-Chief. This was especially true when it came to the COVID-19 pandemic. 

The lion’s share of Governor DeSantis’ polling numbers deal directly with his handling (or ignoring) of the COVID-19 pandemic. While his mentor was either proclaiming that with the coming of warmer weather the virus would disappear, or overriding his medical advisors and urging that hydroxychloroquine and/or household bleach were the way to go, DeSantis was underreporting the number of COVID-19 cases in Florida; at one point during the presidential election, he simply stopped making daily reports so as not to make his mentor look bad. He also refused to close beaches or bars, and urged that public schools be immediately reopened since “as everyone knows, children don’t get COVID-19,”  and refused to institute anything close to the wearing of masks in public. It got so bad that in December of last year - after Trump lost the election - DeSantis went back to making statistical reports and urging that nursing homes and senior independent living facilities receive the lion’s share of vaccine; The New Republic named DeSantis its “Scoundrel of the Year.”

So what is DeSantis’ strategy vis-à-vis a presidential campaign in 2024?  Coming out of this past weekend’s CPAC gathering – where only 68% of those polled were in favor of Trump running again – DeSantis is likely putting his money on his mentor’s being either “overly occupied” (all those potential legal challenges) or legally debarred from, “beating the Democrats for a third time.” This means that at this early juncture, Governor DeSantis is running for “Mr. Congeniality,” rather than “Mr. America.” One can only wonder what Trump’s feelings were about his political future when he could only win the approval of 68% of his most loyal supporters. DeSantis is likely bright enough to understand that many Republicans are going to be looking at fresh faces in both 2022 and 2024. But for DeSantis, this will mean having to figure out who he is going to be - and what he’s going to be running on - in a post-Trump world. After several years of being the “Trumpiest of the Trumpeters,” he going to have to change both the key and the mode of his silly symphony . . . which of course carries a lot of political risk. For if there’s one thing hard-corps conservative Republicans truly crave it’s taking government back from the Democrats.  Trump lost it; politicos like Cruz, Rubio, Scott, Graham and DeSantis cannot reverse that trend without altering their tune.

 Coming from the ancient Greek κλώνος (klónos) meaning “twig,” cloning is a technique scientists use to make exact genetic copies of living things. Genes, cells, tissues, and even whole animals can all be cloned. Some cloning is actually done in nature; single-celled organisms like bacteria make exact copies of themselves each time they reproduce. Others, of course are made in a lab.  In the world of politics, clones are created self-consciously by organisms seeking to triumph by imitating the ideas, platforms and messages of others.  But just as in nature or the lab, political clones are subject to the same genetic defects, faults and flaws as their original host.

In other words: beware Governor DeSantis . . . the footsteps in which you wish to tread are filled with genetic glitches, gullies and gremlins.  

Copyright©2021 Kurt F. Stone

ZZZZZZZZ . . .

There is a medieval tale told about the lord of a vast estate who one day decided to ask three questions of a simple-minded, though thoroughly decent, serf. The reward for answering all three questions correctly was the guarantee of remaining on the estate for the rest of his life. If the  serf failed to answer any of the three correctly, he would be summarily thrown off the estate and thus be out of work. Scared to death that he would soon be both homeless and jobless, he pleaded with his bright and beautiful daughter to help him out. The questions, he told her were:

1. What is the biggest thing in the world?

2. What is the fastest thing in the world?

3. What is the best thing in the world?

“And did you get any hint or suggestion that the lord of the manor had any idea what the correct answers were?” the young maiden asked her distraught father.

“None that I could determine,” her father answered.

“That seems likely,” his daughter responded, a twinkle in her eye. “And so, I will give you 3 answers which cannot be wrong, for they are all well beyond both argument or logic.”

“Beyond what?” her father asked. “Never you mind . . . just memorize the answers I will share with you,” she said, and proceeded thusly: “First, the biggest thing in the world is the earth itself. Second, the fastest thing in the world is an idea. And third . . . well, I firmly believe that the lord of the manor will except ‘a good night’s sleep’ as the best possible answer. Got that?” she asked, a broad smile on her face. The next day, the serf showed up in the master’s morning room and gave him the three answers. And behold, all three answers were found to be perfect . . .  and that as such, he and his daughter would live out their days at the vast estate. (According to at least one version of the tale, the daughter wound also wind up marrying the master.)

So what brings this tale to mind? Well, the other day, while awakening to “Morning Joe” on MSNBC, Annie, stretching herself into wakefulness said: Isn’t it wonderful that without ‘45 hogging every headline, Tweet and minute of news, we can get a good night’s sleep and not have to worry so much about what tomorrow’s headline is going to be? God bless Joe Biden and his administration!”

I tell you, my better half is frequently more insightful than I . . . by far more than half. I don’t know about you, but I actually have been sleeping quite a bit more soundly since the inauguration of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris and the creation of the newest Cabinet. It is such a joy (מחיה m’chaya) to awaken each day to a bit of normality; to a cabinet peopled by men and women who are both supremely able and experienced in the areas of governance they have been chosen to lead. They got their jobs and positions not because of their “loyalty to the chief” or the amount of gelt they raised, but rather because of their resumes, experience and areas of expertise. This is something new . . . or a return to something old; a pattern we have not come close to experiencing since the beginning of the Trump years.

During the first month of the Biden/Harris administration we have weathered storms of ice, cold and frigid death; of a second impeachment, a clarion call that “America is back” to both our allies and non-friendly nations . . . as well as a dramatic lowering in the number of those contracting COVID-19. We have begun to experience just how much progress can be made when the decibel level is lowered and those who disagree are treated with a bit more humanity and respect. Under “normal circumstances,” this is not a matter of earth-shattering proportions; coming on the heels of the previous administration, this is a change of earth-shattering proportions.

Yes, we have witnessed Senator Lindsey Graham’s threat to impeach Vice President Harris just as soon as Republicans take back the House; as well as newly-elected Representative Marjorie Taylor’s Greene’s (Q-GA) promise to impeach President Biden and Congress’s promise to hold up any COVID-19 relief measure for the American people. And yet, Biden/Harris’ public approval rating is at nearly 70% - far, far above anything achieved by Trump/Pence during their 4 years in office.

This is not to say that the far right-wing conspirators (whose numbers include political enfant terrible Roger Stone and Infowars’ founder and chief conniver Alex Jones) who created, carried out and financed the January 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol are either sanguine or silenced. They are still part of a horrific and dangerous cabal which will keep American Democracy in the crosshairs for the immediate future. And yet, with a Justice Department under the leadership of Merrick Garland, they shall, I firmly believe, be brought to justice; they shall soon learn what years behind bars truly mean.

All in all, the changes which have already begun changing and disinfecting the political world at home will, God willing, add up to many, many more sleepful hours and positive thoughts about the immediate future of the United States of America . . . the last, best hope the world has for humanity and normality.

Copyright©2021 Kurt F. Stone

Dancing in the Dark,

                     Charisse & Astaire: “Dancing in the Dark”

Despite its title, this week’s post has virtually nothing to do with the sensual balletic piece essayed by Fred Astaire and Cyd Charisse in the 1953 MGM classic “The Band Wagon.” Rather, this post deals with the second impeachment trial of Donald J. Trump, which is winding up even as I write these very words. Up to this point, the 9 Democratic House managers have presented a tour-de-force - a prosecutorial masterstroke - which even gained the muted plaudits of Republican members of the United States Senate and the former inhabitant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. For those of us who watched their tag-team prosecution, it seemed inconceivable that anyone could turn a blind eye to the crime of the former POTUS, and vote for acquittal. Then came the presentation of Trump’s legal team which, in comparison to the triumph of Reps. Raskin, Liu, Castro et al fell as flat as a sheet of Saran Wrap.  And yet, even before closing arguments, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and his colleagues began announcing that they would unhesitatingly vote for acquittal. 

How is this possible?  What fills their hearts and brains?  What do their eyes see or their ears hear? Do they suffer from some kind of collective Spondylosis which makes it impossible for them to stand erect and do the right thing?  Are they toadies or patriots?  Are they motivated by fear, greed or hatred? 

First things first: the chances of Donald J. Trump being convicted by a two-thirds majority of the Senate are impossible; he will be acquitted.  His 2016 prediction will once again be proven true: "I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn't lose any voters, OK? It's, like, incredible."  

(THIS JUST IN: THE SENATE, BY A VOTE OF 57-43, VOTED AGAINST CONVICTION. ONLY 7 OF THE SENATE’S 50 REPUBLICANS VOTED FOR CONVICTION WHILE 43 VOTED TO ACQUIT HIM OF THE SINGLE CHARGE; ALL 50 DEMOCRATS VOTED FOR CONVICTION.)

After listening to both sides - the prosecution and defense - and weighing both the facts and fantasies separating the two sides, I am absolutely astonished that the vast majority of Republicans could still vote against conviction.  Indeed, shortly after the final vote was tallied, Minority Leader McConnell gave —what at least for him - was the harshest and most scathing assessment of Donald J. Trump that any Republican outside of those affiliated with “The Lincoln Project” could give. He excoriated the former president for his legal, moral and political deficiencies, and went so far as to accuse him of violating the very oath he took on January 20, 2017 - the one in which he solemnly pledged that “. . . to the best of my ability,” he would “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America. . . so help me God.” With his speech of extreme disapprobation (“There’s no question — none — that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of the day . . .”), Senator McConnell hit the nail squarely on the head. And yet, he still voted against conviction on the scantiest and most sophistical of grounds (“We have no power to convict and disqualify a former officeholder who is now a private citizen.”)

To my way of thinking the Senate Minority Leader and the overwhelming majority of his (Trump’s?) party, are “dancing in the dark;” bumping into the political furniture, incapable of keeping up with the rhythm, “waltzing in the wonder of why we’re here,” to quote a line from Howard Dietz’s original lyric. Is it fear of Donald Trump that kept Senate Republicans in line? Could it be earth-bred hatred for progressives or the steadfast need to be reelected at any cost?  Or is it something else?  Let’s take a look at a handful of possibilities:

1. The fear of Donald Trump: Let’s face it: the first rule of politics is “get thyself reelected . . . no matter what the price or cost.”  A vote to convict (on the part of Republican office-holders up for future reelection - especially in 2022) could mean drawing an even more ardently doctrinaire Trumpeter in the next primary.  Simply stated, discovering that one is likely going to be challenged in the Republican primary by a Marjorie Taylor Greene or a Matt Gaetz just because they opposed Donald Trump has got to be a conservative politician’s worst nightmare . . . and biggest motivator. 

2. An earth-bred hatred for anything and everything that smacks of “progressivism”: Due to the nature of modern talk-radio and hyper-partisan cable news, social media politics and the often wacky views of donors with deep pockets, a politician must not only work against people from “the other side:” one must publicly abhor them with a passion. They are not just “the enemy:’’ they are the servants of Satin.  (It must be said that this goes for elected officials on both sides of the aisle, but far more so for followers of Donald J.) Do Republicans really, truly believe this about Democrats?  In private, possibly no; in public undoubtedly yes. One must not get in trouble or draw the ire of the Donald’s base. 

3. Cowardice: By and large, successful politicians like people - at least those who vote for them.  It’s nearly impossible for a misanthrope to make a go of it in the peculiar three-ring circus known as  politics.  There are so many people who want to grab your ear for a brief chat, take a picture, or tell you either how wonderful or woeful you are. Then there are those above you who, with a snap of the fingers, can start you on an upward trajectory or fill your socks with cement. As a result, not wishing to be offensive, many politicians take the coward’s way out.  I have to believe that many of the 43 Republican votes against conviction were the result of base cowardice.  Whatever happened to “profiles in courage?”

4. Something else: It has long been my belief that one of the smartest, most essential (though ultimately most difficult) things we could do to tone down - if not rid us of - all the fiery political partisanship and misfeasance would be overturning the  Supreme Court’s 2010 ruling in Citizens United v. FEC. In this atrocious decision, the court held that the free speech clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent expenditures for political communications by corporations, including nonprofit corporations, labor unions, and other associations. In a sense, this court decision turned politicians and their campaigns into the willing slaves of the אוֹגעשטאַפט מיט געלט (ongeschtupt mit gelt: Yiddish for “stuffed with money) class; always willing to do, vote or espouse that which their hyper-wealthy patrons and matrons command.  Although not an absolute cure-all, overturning this decision, which in my estimation was “Worse Than Dred Scott,” could be as powerful a curative as Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.

Although I’m sure that a sizeable percentage of the American public would have greatly preferred that the Senate had summoned up the political Stones to convict this mumzer, we can take consolation (without delving into the netherworld of schadenfreude) that Donald J. Trump is going to be attacked on all fronts; some legal and many financial. He will pay a steep price for being . . . well, Donald J. Trump.  And as for the Republican Party?  They are in need of a serious overhaul; no longer will they be able to bill themselves as the party of values, patriotism and law & order.

And who knows? Maybe in between depositions, future bankruptcies and growing isolation, the former president will hopefully come to understand just how difficult and painful it is to dance in the dark.

Copyright©2021 Kurt F. Stone

What's Good For the Goose . . .

                                                   Will Rogers

Back in the late nineteen teens through the mid-nineteen thirties, one of the most beloved people in the United States was vaudevillian-turned movie star-turned down home philosopher Will Rogers. Rogers (1879-1935) was at one time the world’s highest-paid movie star ($35K a week) the honorary mayor of Beverly Hills, and easily the most quotable wit of the day. His aphorisms, frequently couched in humorous terms, were widely quoted: "I am not a member of an organized political party. I am a Democrat," one of his wittier jibes went. Without question, his best-known quote was "I never met a man I didn't like." Despite all the humor, Rogers “hizzoner” the honorary mayor was also a serious political player with a keen eye for what was right and/or wrong with the two-party system. Will senior died in a plane crash in a plane piloted by daredevil Wiley Post in 1935.  The nation was devastated. His son, Will Rogers Jr., served a single term in Congress in the early 1940s as a representative from California’s 16th district.

One has to believe that were Will Rogers - or someone like him - alive today, he would have plenty to say about the current state of partisan politics in the United States. He would have despised the fact that national Republicans, fearing the politics of such ethnic progressives as Reps. Ilhan Omar (D.MN), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), Rashida Talib (D-MI) and Ayanna Pressley (D.MA) - (collectively known as “The Squad”) - had become the name and face (the brand) of the entire National Democratic Party. Through cherry-picking the loudest, boldest and brashest of their quotes and political proposals, Republicans have sought to make these four progressives - plus 2020 freshmen Jamaal Bowman and Cori Bush (both of whom are black) - the end-all and be-all of Democratic Party politics. What the national Republican Party has done its best to convince their loyalists of is that because of “The Squad,” the entire Democratic Party establishment is made up of nothing but anti-Semitic, anti-Israel Socialists and anti-Christian immoralists, whose major political goal is nothing more destroying white Christian America.

Of course, the real fear besetting post-Trump Republicans is that soon, white Christian Americans will “achieve” minority status in America. And truth to tell, we really aren’t all that far removed from what they fear. Indeed, the number of African Americans, Hispanics, Asians and other people of foreign parentage is close to overtaking WASP America. Which brings us back to Will Rogers, who suggested that what Democrats most seriously lacked was organization.  I have to believe that were Will alive at the beginning of the Biden Administration, he would seriously urge his party to make such newly-elected people as Marjorie Taylor Greene (R. GA), Lauren Boebert (R.- CO), Matt Gaetz(R. FL) and Nicole Malliotakis (R. NY) the face and figure of the National Republican Party. I’m fairly well convinced that Hizzoner would say that “What’s good for the (Republican) goose, is just as good for the (Democratic) gander.

Consider that 199 members of the Congressional Republican caucus voted in favor of the Georgia anti-Semite (MTG) keeping her committee assignments . . . finding little or no problem backing a colleague who believes that Jews are responsible for burning forests in California, that Democrats are pedophiles and are are largely responsible for the deaths of both President John F. Kennedy and his son JFK. Jr., and that Speaker Nancy Pelosi should be assassinated.  What bothers me the most is that the two Jewish Republicans serving in the House (New York’s Lee Zeldin and David Kustoff of Tennessee) found no problem supporting Ms. Taylor-Greene’s remaining on the House Education Committee – despite her statement that the  mass murders at  Parkland, Florida’s Marjorie  Stoneman Douglas High School were “false flags.” 

 The fact that these 199 Republicans gave an electoral thumbs-up to a vile, unlettered anti-Semitic bigot who never met a conspiracy she didn’t love, is far more than a GOP problem: it’s an American problem. As the Washington Post’s Dana Milbank wrote just the other day, “You don’t have to be a scholar of 20th-century Europe to know what happens when the elected leaders of a democracy condone violence as a political tool and blame the country’s ills on the Jews and Zionists.

To my way of thinking, it’s high time that Democrats take a page from the Republican political playbook and brand the G.O.P. the party of not Lincoln, but rather of MTG, Lauren Boebert, Matt Gaetz, Jim Jordan, Ted Cruz and North Carolina’s Ted Budd.

For those who don’t yet know him, Rep. Budd is the fellow who, during the vote on whether to strip Marjorie Taylor Greene of her committee assignments told his colleagues that “today is really about one party single-handedly canceling a member of the other party because of something said before that member was even elected.” How droll! From his words, it is clear that Budd knows nothing about 20th century American political history. If he did, he might know that for more than sixty years, Republicans reminded anyone who would listen that West Virginia Senator Robert Byrd (1917-2010) was once (depending on who was doing the telling) either a member of - or exalted ruler of - the K.K.K. back in the 1940s, and that therefore, all Democrats were virulent racists. And while it is true that as a young man, Byrd was a short-timer in that noxious organization, he later wrote that he was a KKK member because he "was sorely afflicted with tunnel vision—a jejune and immature outlook—seeing only what I wanted to see because I thought the Klan could provide an outlet for my talents and ambitions." Byrd also said in 2005, "I know now I was wrong. Intolerance had no place in America. I apologized for a thousand times ... and I don't mind apologizing over and over again. I can't erase what happened."

Indeed, if what’s good for the goose is good for the gander, then both Democrats and Republicans should never forget that MTG and her colleagues are just as vile and stupidly hateful today as they were even before they were first elected to congress.

In the eyes of most Republicans, Democrats are under the spell of a feminine “squad.” Perhaps it is time for Democrats to accuse Republicans of being in thrall to a brigade of bigots.

Hizzoner, Will Rogers, knew all about this a long, long time ago, when he wrote ““The problem ain’t what people know. It’s what people know that ain’t so that’s the problem.”

Copyright©2021, Kurt F. Stone

A World Without Alice

Our mother Alice and her mother Anne had a lot in common: in their latter life they both had beautiful snow-white hair. Mom actually let her hair go a luxurious grey back in her thirties but just as easily could have the color changed to pink, blue or fire engine red. (My sister Erica and I would long remember the days when we wondered just what color she would be sporting when she picked us up from school.) Like Granny, Mom was theatrical to the max (which is, of course, terribly important for an actor); merely entering a room made the room seem and feel quite a bit smaller. Both were married to the loves of their lives for precisely 59 years and outlived them for nearly two decades. Both were highly literate (Granny could recite dozens upon dozens of poems by heart right up to the end of her life), terribly funny and just beneath the surface a bit naughty. They were both quite political. They were both true ladies; at the same time, they were also true broads. Of both, it was said by family and friends alike, “Ah she’ll outlive us all.” They both lived active lives of privilege and passion, and are still the topic of almost daily remembrance. They both died of what one might refer to as “terminal longevity.”

                                Alice K. Stone (1924-2021)

The biggest difference, of course, is that the reminiscences of Alice (a.k.a. Mom, Grandma, Grandmere, Allie, Gussy and Madame) began in earnest this past shabbat, when she passed away at 7:36 a.m., just one week before her 97th birthday. For Mom, the whole world, in Shakespeare’s lucid prose, was “a stage . . . and all the men and women merely players; they have their exits and entrances, and one man in his time plays many parts.” (Spoken by the melancholy Jacque in Act II Scene VII of As You Like It.)

A Chicago native who was raised partly in Kansas City, Missouri, Mom was both a student at the Chicago Art Institute and a member of a theatre troupe called the “Chase Street Players.”  She found her way out to Hollywood after a chance backstage encounter with  the fabled Lillian Gish, convinced her that her future lay in the town that dreams built.  There, she met our father Henry at a party given by her cousin Mitzi . . . and the rest was history.  He was her Ronald Coleman  to her Carole Lombard.  Anything he could break (which was most everything) she could repair.  Despite (or perhaps because of) their many dissimilarities, they made a spectacular couple.  They traveled the world, had several beautiful homes (for which Mom did the interior decoration) and were the envy of most everyone who ever met them.  Erica (Riki) and I have heard from countless friends who over the years remembered wishing that Alice and Henry could have been their parents!  One thing that this family never was and never shall be is boring . . .

As a singer, Mom was what we call a “belter.”  As a dancer, she was as lithe as Ginger Rogers (and at one time, like Ginger, was a platinum blond); she had a strong lower-range speaking voice and utterly perfect diction and didn’t need a microphone; as a writer, she excelled. Mom taught me all I ever needed to know with precisely three bits of advice:

1. “If you want to write you’ve got to read . . . everything.”

2. “Once you put pen to paper, keep asking  yourself “What do I want to say?”

3. Writing is no different than speaking; just have your pen speak to the paper.”

I remember once, many years ago, when Mom volunteered to direct and produce a grand Confirmation ceremony at our synagogue.  She sat in the back of a cavernous sanctuary, watching each of the 60-odd students speak their parts and learn their staging.  Now mind you, the majority of these 16-year olds were “Hollywood Brats,” know more than most about how to put speak before an audience and put on a performance.  It so happens that I was appointed to give the valedictory address . . . an essay entitled The Hippy in the Grey Flannel Suit.  Mom was very strict with me and kept shouting out instructions and having  me repeat phrases again and again until I got it to her satisfaction.  Truth to tell, I felt more than a little bit of humiliation.  Afterword, I asked her why she hadn’t been so fussy with any of my classmates.  Her answer?  “You have a gift for writing and speaking that none of the others possess.  I simply want you to be a star!”  Mom was always a hard act to follow.

Did she have an ego? Oh my yes! But then again, show me an actor without one and I will introduce you to an abject failure. But as with most thespians, Alice was, at root, shy. It’s only when the houselights go down and the spot light begins performing its magic that shyness gives way to performance. That was Alice . . . as it was with Granny.

Over the past couple of decades, Mom has had a wonderful, wonderful companion named Fred Kaplan. Fred (we refer to him as either “California Fwed” or “Two-Legged Fwed”) so as not to confuse anyone with our pooch, who’s name is “Fwed Astair Stone . . . some day I’ll let you in on how “Fred” became “Fwed”) is easily a dozen or more years younger than Alice. I remember when we were first about to meet. Just before he arrived, Mom told me how much younger he was than she. “And how old am I supposed to be?” I asked her. She started laughing to beat the band. “Oh, I finally told him my age just the other day.” Well, we were still laughing when Fred arrived. “What’s so funny?” he asked, beginning to chuckle himself although he knew not why. Mom explained the dido and concluded by saying “You do realize that until the other day, I never told you my age?” Fred smiled, took her hand and said “Madam, you do realize that I’ve never asked you your age!” With that I had no choice but to tell “Madam” that I thoroughly approved of her gentleman caller; we’ve been like older brother/younger brother ever since. He has been her constant companion, worrier and hand-holder for many years . . . as much a part of the family as anyone.

More than anyone in her latter life, it is my Slightly Older Sister (MSOS) Erica who must receive the greatest number of plaudits.  She has been mom’s chief worrier, banker, accountant, shopper and “bestest of best friends.”  And she, unlike almost anyone I’ve ever known and loved, keeps getting smarter and wiser with every passing year.  How is it possible?  Well, I guess its just part of being a Stone.

There is an old Jewish belief that when a person passes away on the Sabbath, it is akin to ha-Shem (G-d) placing a celestial exclamation point in the heavens declaring that the deceased was very, very special. And the kicker is that should one ask “So what was so special about Alice?” the only possible answer would be “If you need ask, you obviously didn’t know her.

And so shortly, with every hair in place, her prepossessing punim made up for a coronation (or an opening night) and a ring on every finger (though not the real ones), she shall be laid to rest next to our father Henry (“Hen”) and just down the hill from Granny Annie and Grandpa Doc. For myself and Anna, Erica and Bob, grandchildren Adam and Mariella, Julie and Jimmy, Nurit and Scott, Ilan and Amanda and Ilana, as well as great grandchildren Emily, Claire, Jacob, Mia and Lucas, we know that we have been blessed far more than most, and have a glorious heritage and tons of stories to hang on to.

The great Oscar Wilde (whom Mom first introduced me to when I was quite young), once wrote: “I regard the theatre as the greatest of all art forms, the most immediate way in which a human being can share with another the sense of what it is to be a human being.”

He may well have had Mom in mind.

But a world without Alice? That’s impossible.

You shall always be loved.  

It is time to dim the theatre lights . . .

  Copyright©2021 Kurt F. Stone

Rechanneling C.J. Cregg

Who remembers Trump Press Secretary Sean Spicer’s first official appearance before the world’s media? Anyone recall what the major issue was? Well, it fell to the perpetually angrified Mr. Spicer to tell the assembled journalists in no uncertain terms that the Trump inauguration was the best-attended in all American history . . . notwithstanding video and print captures which proved how sparsely attended it actually had been. Spicer’s noisome presentation pretty much set the stage for all future Trump Press Secretaries, and made many long for the days of the fictional C.J. Cregg, as superbly portrayed by actress Allison Janney on the best political drama in television history: The West Wing.

Janney’s C.J. Cregg was loosely based on Clinton Press Secretary Dee Dee Myers, who was hired to be a show consultant. (n.b.: MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell was one of The West Wing’s consulting/executive producers from 2001-2006).  As portrayed by Janney (who is currently starring in the 8th season of the comedy Mom) C.J. Cregg was brash and beautiful, maximally politically literate and mordantly humorous.  And, despite being the smartest person in the presidential press room (except when President Josiah “Jed” Bartlett happened to be present)  C.J. treated her colleagues as equals.  How unlike the aforementioned Sean Spicer whose stint as Presidential Press Secretary lasted a mere 182 days, only to be replaced by Sarah Sanders (who served 1 year, 345 days), who was in turn replaced by Stephanie Grisham (281 days), who was finally replaced by Kayleigh McEnany (288 days).  (BTW: Steve Early, FDR’s Press Secretary, holds the record for service: he held his position for virtually the entire 3+ terms FDR served March 3, 1933 - March 29, 1945).

Without question, this past Wednesday, January 20, 2021, was a most compelling and uplifting day. For in addition to the swearing in of Kamala Harris as America’s first female - and first African American of Indian/Jamaican descent - as Vice President, President Joseph R. Biden’s stirring message of hope and unity, and the breathtaking talents of 3 young women - singers Lady Gaga and Jennifer Lopez and 22-year old Amanda Gorman’s spine tingling poetry, there was also the a return of normality to the White House Press Room. As one writer noted, “No stranger to the media glare from her considerable experience with the Obama White House, Jen Psaki embraced a refreshingly dignified approach to reporters, free of the dishonesty, dissembling and derision that had punctuated the previous four years.”

"I have deep respect for the role of a free and independent press in our democracy, and for the role all of you play," she said in response to the very first question. "As I noted earlier, there will be moments when we disagree, and there will certainly be days where we disagree for extensive parts of the briefing . . . . But we have a common goal, which is sharing accurate information with the American people."

“Rebuilding trust with the American people will be central to our focus in the press office and in the White House every single day," added Psaki, who vowed to bring "truth and transparency back to the briefing room.” She committed to "sharing information even when it is hard to hear", amid a rampant infodemic that has divided society and fueled Covid-19's horrific toll.

During her initial conference - in which she fielded questions with all the grace and ease of a Hall of Fame shortstop like Ozzie Smith or Cal Ripken - Jen Psaki told her colleagues “There will be times where we see things differently in this room … that’s OK. That’s part of our democracy, and rebuilding trust with the American people will be central to our focus in the press office and in the White House every single day.”

The contrast between Jen Ptaki and any - every one? - of Donald Trump’s Press Secretaries is like that between night and day,  or the members of Mensa and the Hawaiian shirt-wearing Boogaloo Bois. Civility, respect and a measure of mature calm - such as we have not experienced for the past several years - already seem to be hallmarks of both the nascent administration and the woman who is already the voice and face of that administration. 

It is all quite reminiscent of the fictional President Josiah Barlet (played by Martin Sheen), Secretary of State Lewis Berryhill (Wm. Devane), Chief of Staff Leo McGarry (John Spencer) and of course Press Secretary (and future Chief of Staff C.J. Cregg (Allison Janney).  

For those who were, are and always shall be fans of The West Wing - and there are millions - you will remember the very last words spoken by President Barlet at the end of the pilot episode: “What’s next?”  Anyone notice that the final two words spoken by Jen Psaki at the end of her first presidential press conference were the same: “What’s next?”

A coincidence?

I think not . . . just Joe Biden’s press secretary channeling C.J. Cregg . . . the best two words I’ve heard in long, long time.

Copyright©2021 Kurt F. Stone

The Living Embodiment of Irony

ironic //īˈränik: happening in the opposite way to what is expected, and typically causing wry amusement because of this.

Anyone notice the extreme irony of Donald Trump’s last days as POTUS as compared to his first? Throughout the fateful 2016 campaign against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, “Boss Tweet” spent a great deal of time promising to build a “big beautiful wall” between the U.S. and Mexico. He promised it would solve most, if not all our immigration problems by keeping out the violent, job stealing dregs of humanity stealing across our southern border. And the price? No object; Mexico was going to pay for it. He was so serious about this wall that beginning in late December 2018, he actually shut down the federal government for well over a month unless and until Congress gave him all the money he wanted in order to complete it. At one point, he even famously said he would be “proud” to own the governmental closure required to secure the funding . . . and then put the blame on Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer and the Democrats. (BTW: when asked about what happened to the Mexican payment, he simply denied ever having said a word about it and, true to form, blamed the “lame stream” media. about it.  

Four years later, as President-elect Joe Biden and Vice-President-elect Kamala Harris are about to shed their respective title adjectives, we find that during his four years in office, Donald Trump has built precisely 15 miles of wall along our southern border.  And here’s where the irony comes in:  In the final days of the Trump/Pence administration, a virtually impregnable fence has been constructed all around the Capitol grounds to keep the very symbol of our Democratic Republic safe not from illegal immigrants, but rather from home-grown, home-sewn domestic terrorists.  In other words, Donald Trump accomplished what he promised . . . but in the most ironic way imaginable. 

The first blog I posted after Donald Trump’s inauguration came out on January 23, 2017 and was entitled Can Knowledge Be More Dangerous Than Ignorance? That was blog #629, and already evinced a weary, jaundiced feeling about the new administration and its leader. Today’s blog, which posts 3 days before the next inauguration, is #826. This post carries a degree of hope and energy a vast number of us have not felt for a long, long time. Ever since November 3, 2020, the Biden/Harris team has shown a greater degree of humanity, organizational smarts and political professionalism than anything we have experienced since the end of the Obama/Biden years. But let’s not kid ourselves: the country faces formidable challenges in such diverse - though ultimately, interlocking and tangible - areas as public health, economy, racial justice and international relations, not to mention such abstract necessities as empathy, civility, and trustworthiness. We as a nation must together relearn that just because the law does not forbid something, doesn’t mean that it should be done.

I for one have been both heartened and thoroughly impressed by the caliber, competence and experience of the people named to join the incoming administration. Unlike those they are replacing from the previous administration, these men and women are capable of hitting the ground running; they have no need to introduce themselves to their institutional constituency. Let us both hope and work for their acceptance by the United States Senate.  Now controlling the barest of majorities in the Senate, the Democrats should be able to manage this feat without undo exhaustion or political horse trading.  Then too, I urge senatorial Republicans to give the Biden/Harris team an opportunity to lead.  Try hard not to claim before your constituency that the Biden/Harris folks are “a bunch of  ultra left-wing communists and socialists.”  You know that’s not true, so why lie to them?  For the sake of an election in 2022 or 2024?  

Let us also urge the opposition not to waste time and precious energy pointing out each and every one of the incoming President and Vice President’s shortcomings, character flaws or supposed past vices.  They are both good and honorable people . . . who also happen to be human beings. By now, you should know that they consider themselves to be servants of the people.  After what we’ve experienced these past four years in terms of what one might call “private cupidity as public policy,” it will be next to impossible for anyone with an ounce of honesty or reason to accuse Joe Biden or Kamala Harris of being corrupt. Woodrow Wilson, likely the most academically sagacious of all presidents once said, “the difference between the two parties is that the Republicans are the party of property; Democrats the party of the people.”  For Republicans to support Donald Trump even after all he has done for himself and then turn around and accuse Joe Biden of essentially being the head of a crime syndicate is not only deeply ironic; it is the height of madness.

Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and a Democratic Congress are not going to bring clear skies overnight. They will, I believe, do their very best to bring honesty, civility and morality back into politics. It’s not going to be easy. President Biden is facing the most divided nation since Abraham Lincoln . . . and he knows it. But unlike his predecessor, he has lived a real life devoted to making the lives and dreams of real people manifest. If ever a POTUS/VPOTUS need prayers said on their behalf, this would be it. Were I to have been honored with delivering the opening prayer (which I was not . . . no problem) I would quote the angriest, most insightful of all the prophets: Isaiah (61:1):                                          

        ר֛וּחַ אֲדֹנָ֥י יְהֶוִֹ֖ה עָלָ֑י יַ֡עַן מָשַׁח֩ יְהֹוָ֨ה אֹתִ֜י לְבַשֵּׂ֣ר עֲנָוִ֗ים שְׁלָחַ֨נִי֙ לַֽחֲבֹ֣שׁ לְנִשְׁבְּרֵי־לֵ֔ב לִקְרֹ֤א לִשְׁבוּיִם֙ דְּר֔וֹר וְלַֽאֲסוּרִ֖ים פְּקַח־קֽוֹחַ

(Ruach adonai eh’loheem ah-lye: ya’ahn mashakh adonai oh-tee l’va-sayr ah-na-veem sh’lakhani , l’ckhavosh l’nee’b’ray-layv, leekro l’ishvuyim d’ror, v’la-ahsureem p’kakh ko-akh.”

Namely, “The spirit of the Lord God was upon me, since the Lord anointed me to bring tidings to the humble, He sent me to bind up the broken-hearted, to declare freedom for the captives, and for the prisoners to free from captivity.”

Of a certainty, this is a tall, tall order; but one I feel resolutely certain President Biden and Vice President Harris will carry out with every fiber of their being.

Copyright©2021 Kurt F. Stone

For What It's Worth . . .

                          The Buffalo Springfield, c. 1966

According to an urban legend, rocker Stephen Stills wrote the 1966 classic protest song “For What It’s Worth” as a response to the Vietnam War. As with many such legends, it’s simply not true. Rather, that which provided the motivation for his writing one of Rock’s all-time legendary protest songs was the long-forgotten Sunset Strip Curfew riots in 1966 - a classic countercultural clash between the L.A.P.D. and young people on the Sunset Strip in my hometown, Hollywood, California. This song, as recorded by the then 21-year old Stills and his band, The Buffalo Springfield, became an instant classic.  So much so that here in 2021 - 55 years after it was first recorded - it is just as vibrant and meaningful - even if misunderstood - as during the Capitol Hill invasion by President Donald Trump’s militant crazies just this past week.

There's something happening here

But what it is ain't exactly clear

There's a man with a gun over there
Telling me I got to beware

 I think it's time we stop
 Children, what's that sound?
 Everybody look, what's going down?

Many of you reading this blog will remember various marches on Washington, in which we came together in the late 1960s and early 1970s to protest the war in Vietnam.  I myself attended many . . . not as an angry protester, but rather as an “insider,” whose task it was to teach the many, many protesters coming largely from Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Columbia, Chicago and Berkeley, to teach them the basics of decorum when meeting up with members of the Cabinet and elected officials in Congress.  (While they stayed on the floors of youth hostels, I had the great fortune of being put up at Averill Harriman’s home in Georgetown.)  We wanted to make sure that these largely teenage protesters,  regardless of their political pique, and addiction to both pot and Country Joe and the Fish, acted like civilized adults.  It must have worked; shortly after our “attack” on the nation’s capitol, LBJ announced that he would not run for reelection. 

There's battle lines being drawn
 Nobody's right if everybody's wrong
 Young people speaking their minds
  Getting so much resistance from behind

  It's time we stop
  Hey, what's that sound?
  Everybody look, what's going down?

Mind you, we did not storm the Capitol bearing weapons of harm and hurt;  we were content to have our presence duly noted, our voices and lyrics heard.  For the most part, we were a pretty literate, well-educated mass . . . so totally unlike the mob of right-wing insurgents who acted far more like criminal cultists than engaged citizens. We - yesteryear’s mass gathering of anti-war, anti-draft protesters - were just as angry back then as the largely White Supremacist, racist criminals who shot an arrow into the heart of democracy this past Wednesday.  We were against what a tone-deaf administration was engaged in; this new gathering - ironically made up largely of people  (mostly males) the age of our eldest children - were attacking and attempting to bring down an entire society.  We were armed with tons of facts, blamed LBJ for the war and General Hershey for the Selective Service System and had a lot of negative feelings about what was then collectively known as “The Establishment”; we were accused of being immoral Communists and Socialists. Today’s insurrectionists are motivated mostly by lies they believe to be the utter truth;  lies perpetrated  by their cult leader, the President of the United States.  The one thing that remains the  same is that we, the protesters of yore are still being called immoral Communists and Socialists.  One major  difference is that back during the “Days of Rage,” many of us actually knew what the difference between Marxists, Maoists, Trotskyites and Titoists were, whereas to today’s Trumpian seditionists, a lower-case “communist” is simply someone who has not bought into the lies, the fears, the conspiracies or stereotypes spread about by their beloved leader.

 What a field day for the heat (Ooh ooh ooh)
  A thousand people in the street (Ooh ooh ooh)
  Singing songs and they carrying signs (Ooh ooh ooh)
  Mostly say hooray for our side

It's time we stop
Hey, what's that sound?

Everybody look, what’s going down?

With each passing day, we are learning more and more about what this horrifying event: 

• About how it was all planned in plain sight;

• About how much culpability Donald Trump and  his many cowardly Congressional enablers possess;

• About what these craven thousands brought with them to Washington, D.C in terms of weaponry;

• About how far they were willing to go in their attempt to overturn the  2020 election;

• About the conspiratorial nature of the event;

• About just how lucky that things were not worse.

Without question, what  Donald  Trump and his hypnotized hooligans carried off was the absolute low-water mark in all American history. Drawing upon his childhood in post-World War II Austria, former California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, a Republican, compared Wednesday's riot at the Capitol to Kristallnacht, also known as the Night of Broken Glass, the rampage of violence by the Nazi regime against Jewish communities, synagogues and businesses in Germany and Austria in 1938. "Wednesday was the day of broken glass right here in the United States," he said, referring to broken windows in the Capitol building. But the mob also "shattered the ideas we took for granted" and "trampled the very principles on which our country was founded."  Not a particularly successful governor of the nation’s largest state, the “Governator” firmly placed the blame on Donald Trump for continuing to make baseless claims of election fraud and "misleading people with lies." 

"My father and our neighbors were misled also with lies and I know where such lies lead," the  former actor said. "President Trump is a failed leader. He will go down in history as the worst President ever." 

Paranoia strikes deep
Into your life it will creep
 It starts when you're always afraid
 Step out of line, the men come and take you away

 We better stop
  Hey, what's that sound?
  Everybody look, what's going down?

It has long been clear that Donald Trump is a psychological train wreck; a person who never should have been elected president. Some of the harshest, most on the money criticism of him was voiced more than 5 years ago by people like Senators Rubio (FL), Cruz (TX) and Graham (SC) who of course are still in his enabling corner. In all, it turns out that 8 senators and 139 representatives voted to overturn the 2020 election results. And despite the fact that there were and are a tremendous number of anti-Semites among the most fanatic and delusional of Trump supporters, all three Jewish Republican members of Congress (Tennessee’s David Kustoff and New York’s Elissa Slotkin and Lee Zeldin) voted to decertify the electoral college returns. To my way of thinking not only these three - but indeed all 147 members of Congress should be held accountable in the next election.

As I write these words, Vice President Mike Pence - who is currently in his boss’s dog house - is visiting the White House.  Whether he’s there to convince Donald Trump to resign (in exchange, perhaps for a pardon), submit to being replaced by his #2 under terms of the25th  Amendment, or be impeached for the second time is anyone’s guess.  Two  things which are reasonably certain:

1. Donald Trump is in a very, very dark place; scared to death of what’s going to happen to him the moment he leaves the White House, and

2. He’s going to known throughout the rest of history as America’s biggest loser; the  man who, ironically is going to hear the words “YOU’RE FIRED!” every hour of every day for the rest of his life.

Then too, it is possible  that the movement he and his enablers have created is going to suffer a tremendous loss of political potency.  Historically, cults begin to fade once the leader leaves the stage . . . whether through imprisonment, mortality or suffering from the  “Wizard of Oz syndrome.”  President-elect Biden  and Vice President-elect Harris are going to have their hands full bringing America back from the brink and reintroducing what is best about this  country  to not  only our friends and allies, but our enemies  as well.  

We better stop
 Hey, what's that sound?

Everybody look, what's going down?

Copyright©2021 Kurt F. Stone

For What It's Worth lyrics © Cotillion Music Inc., Ten-east Music, Springalo Toones, Ten East Music, Richie Furay Music, Cotillion Music, Inc.

Charles Dickens Said It Best

In paying close attention to what all has been going on these past several hours - both the terrible, Trump-inspired insurrection at the Capitol and the Democrats taking back the Senate with the election of both an African-American preacher and a 33-year old Jewish political activist, I am reminded of what is without question the greatest opening paragraph in all English literature:

“It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of light, it was the season of darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair.” ("A Tale of Two Cities" by Chas. Dickens.)

This just about says it all . . .

Politics As a Poorly Played Chess Match

Anyone who has ever been a student in any of my “All Politics All the Time” courses at Florida International University (now beginning their 23rd year), knows that I liken big-league, big-time politics not to a game of Texas Hold-em Poker, but rather to a chess match. Why? Because the former, as I understand it, is pretty freewheeling, while in chess, participants, in the main, have two different possible strategies by which to play: either ascertain your opponent’s next 4, 5, or 6 moves (in an effort to get you to play their game), or to force your opponent to unknowingly play your game. Either plan can lead to victory . . . or defeat. To my way of thinking, that’s the essence of hard-core politics . . . if played with intelligence, foresight and a first-rate crystal ball. My preference is to get my opponent to play my game . . . to fall into my trap.

The same goes with politics. Played correctly, few things happen accidentally or out of sheer luck. That’s probably why world-class campaign managers and political strategists are in such high demand; they know what they’re doing. Or at least that‘s the way things are supposed to go. In the age of Donald Trump - where the candidate/incumbent is also his own master strategist and chief political bottle-washer, things can be unbelievably confusing and tending to suffer from high levels of incomprehensible anomie (a term invented by Emile Durkheim, the French father of Sociology meaning “a condition of instability resulting from a breakdown of standards and values or from a lack of purpose or ideals”. Unlike with previous presidents and presidential candidates, Boss Tweet listens to almost no one but himself, rejects and dismisses those who disagree, and only uses the narcissist’s pronoun: the first person singular. 

Well before the November 3, 2020 election, Donald Trump was already telling his favorite entertainers at Fox, News Max and One America News that the only thing that could keep him from being reelected would be a massive act of fraud. More than 2 months after his defeat at the hands of former Vice President Joseph R. Biden, Jr., and California Senator Kamala Harris, he is still performing from the same script.  Whether or not he and his pigeon-hearted acolytes (whether on Capitol Hill, Fox News, or out in the American hinterlands) really, truly believe there was a massive conspiratorial fraud which  led to his defeat is absolutely irrelevant.  Each group has its reason for continuing to back his lunacy.  For  those in office, there is the constant dread that to oppose him - to call him out - would be tantamount to political suicide.  Take Texas Senator Ted Cruz as but one  example.  I mean, here is a guy who, despite his Harvard law degree and the fact that then-presidential candidate Trump accused his father, Rafael Cruz of being part of the conspiracy to assassinate JFK in 1963 and referred to his wife Heidi as “ugly,” is nonetheless  at the forefront of those looking to overthrow the Electoral College come January 6. Then there’s Missouri Senator Josh  Hawley who, despite his Yale Law School degree, was the first member of the Upper Chamber to support what The Atlantic’s  Eric Wehner called “an act of civil vandalism.” 

As of today (Monday, January 4, 2021) along with Cruz and Hawley, there are an additional 10 Republican Senators who will support overturning the Electoral College:  Sens. Marsha Blackburn (Tenn.), Mike Braun (Ind.), Steve Daines (Mont.), Ron Johnson (Wis.), John Kennedy (La.) and James Lankford (Okla.), as well four who were just sworn in yesterday (Sens. Bill Hagerty (Tenn.), Cynthia Lummis (Wyo.), Roger Marshall (Kan.) and Tommy Tuberville (Ala.).  Over on the House side, there are close to 12 dozen Republicans who have declared themselves in favor of overriding the already certified electoral votes from upwards of 6 different states. In other words, when faced with a choice between supporting Donald Trump’s quixotic quest for what at best would be a pyrrhic victory and protecting the Constitution (specifically Amendment 12) which each of them has sworn to “preserve, protect and defend,” they are bigger fans of Mussolini than James Madison.

Back in the late 1920s, Will Rogers - vaudevillian, movie star, essayist, humorist and honorary mayor of Beverly Hills - wrote “I am not a member of any organized  political party; I am a Democrat.” Had he an ounce of wit about him, I’ve got to believe that the (hopefully soon-to-be former) Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell might turn Rogers’ bon mot on its head and sadly proclaim “I am not a member of any organized political party; I am a Republican.”  And he might be correct. For indeed, over the past couple of years, the G.O.P has begun splintering like a piece of old weather-worn balsa. The issues which have brought about this disorganization are not about their leader’s inability to lead, tell the  truth, or show concern for anyone but himself; no, they are more strategic . . . like spending every waking hour bellyaching about the vast conspiracy which denied him reelection, or threatening those who do not bow before him with political annihilation.  Indeed, as I finish writing this paragraph, it has just been reported that ‘45 has  targeted Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) a day after the senator said he would not join Wednesday’s effort to object to the certification of Electoral College votes affirming Joe Biden as the next president.

"How can you certify an election when the numbers being certified are verifiably WRONG,” Trump tweeted, suggesting he would falsely claim during his rally in Georgia later this evening that he was a true winner of the election despite multiple audits and court cases confirming Biden had won and that Trump claims lacked standing.  At one point, the deeply conservative 43 year old Cotton (who is a graduate of both Harvard and Harvard Law) was thought to be a possible presidential candidate in either 2024 or 2028.  Through his tweets, Donald Trump has done his best to put an end to Cotton’s presidential aspirations: "@SenTomCotton” Republicans have pluses & minuses, but one thing is sure, THEY NEVER FORGET!” 

But the balsa is beginning to creak.  

Just the other day, the Republican-controlled Senate handed ‘45 the first veto override of his presidency.  More and more GOP institutionalists (including Leader McConnell, Utah’s Mitt Romney, Alaska’s Lisa Murkowski and Nebraska’s Ben Sasse [who called those who refused to override the veto “institutional arsonists”]) have admitted that Joe Biden did win the 2020 election.  Now under normal circumstances this would be neither especially newsworthy nor a brilliant bit of political strategy.  But these are not normal times.  It’s not just one election that is being called into question.  The endgame here is not so much the reelection of Donald Trump (which no one - and I mean no one) believes for one second is going to happen.  Rather, it is the trashing and ultimate destruction of our representative democracy; it is the willful replacing of Trump with Putin and small-d democracy with capital-A autocracy. 

Just yesterday, ‘45 began his endgame.  The strategy?  Engaging in an hour-long phone conversation with Georgia’s Secretary of State in which he told the Republican Brad Raffensperger "All I want to do is this. I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have. Because we won the state." The phone call featured Trump, just days before he is set to leave office, pleading with Raffensperger to alter the vote total and launching into a barrage of discredited conspiracy theories about the election. He even suggested that Raffensperger may face criminal consequences should he refuse to intervene in accordance with Trump's wishes. During the conversation, Trump floated fragments of several baseless conspiracy theories that were primarily pushed by QAnon followers over the last two months, including a widely debunked theory about voting machines from Dominion Voting Systems.  Once a printed transcript of the phone call (accompanied by a full audio file) of what Trump had said became available, Reps. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) and Kathleen Rice (D-N.Y.) wrote a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray asking him to “open an immediate criminal investigation into the President,” citing statements from the call that suggest Trump was illegally “soliciting election fraud.”

Trump’s endgame strategy is so unbelievably warped that nobody seems to have asked themselves “Who would ever support such a fatally flawed creature again?  People like Senators Cruz and Hawley and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis  (a graduate of Yale and Harvard Law) are clinging as tight as they can to their mentor in the hopes of becoming the G.O.P.’s 2024 nominee for POTUS.  That is probably the worst opening move anyone could ever play . . . short of pulling out a gun and shooting their opponent.  

Polls open in Georgia in just about 12 hours.

2 weeks and 1 day until the inauguration of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

 Might I suggest beginning the match with 1e-4, the “King’s Pawn Opening?” It immediately stakes a claim in the center, and frees two pieces (the queen and the king’s bishop) for action.  Try it: it’s been known to work!

Copyright©2021 Kurt F. Stone

How Low Can You Go?

                                Charles Kushner: Trump’s Mechutan

Unlike a majority of Jewish  people (especially rabbis) residing here in South Florida, I was neither born nor raised in a Lower East Side family where the parents spoke Yiddish whenever they did not want the children to understand what they were saying.  Both I and my slightly older sister Erica (Riki) are 100% Californian. Neither our grandparents nor great-grandparents for that matter were Eastern-European immigrants who came through Eliis Island or Castle Garden and then settled a short distance from their  place of disembarkation. Rather, the earliest generations of Hymans, Greenbergs and Schimbergs were born in 19th century Virginia, Maryland and Minnesota. Their children - our great-grandparents - were native English speakers about as far removed from “Tevya,  Golda and the girls” as can be imagined. The next generation - our great grandparents - raised their families in places like Baltimore, Richmond, Virginia, Chicago and Kansas City. (Granny Annie, my mother’s mother, was born in 1896 in the same St. Paul neighborhood  where just a few days earlier, F(rancis) Scott Key Fitzgerald (F. Scott) had entered the world - not exactly a Yiddishe shetl). As such, neither our great grandparents, grandparents nor parents understood more than 5 words of Yiddish. (I myself did learn a bit of Yiddish with the late Professor Herb Paper out of an urge to be able to read Sholem Aleichem in the original) Indeed, today, whenever we want to speak in front of “Madame” (our soon-to-be 97 year old matriarch) in a language she won’t understand, we (meaning me and Annie) chatter away in Hebrew. (Unlike most America-born, Hollywoodish Jewish great-grandmothers of her generation, she does do reasonably well in French and Italian.) So what in the world does any of this have to do with “Politics & a Whole Lot More,” as the subtitle of this blog has proclaimed for going on 17 years? 

To wit: our purpose is to introduce a Yiddish word that takes a paragraph to explain - a word that soon may become as well known as schmuck, mazal tov, meshuggah, chutzpah, glitch, mensch, shtick and yente - all of which likewise take a brief  sentence or two to explain.  And that word is מחותן (pronounced m’chut’n for a male,  מחותנתטע (pronounced m’chutn’steh for a female, or מחותונים (pronounced m’chutonim in the plural.  Let’s, for the moment, pay attention to the male version (מחותן) of the term.  Derived from the Hebrew word for “groom,” a mchut’n is how one describes the relationship between you and your child’s father-in-law.  A simple example (and getting ever closer to the purpose of this little linguistic exercise) would be to explain the relationship between Donald Trump and Charles Kushner - Jared Kusher’s father . . . the one just given a presidential pardon.  Charles Kushner is Donald and Melania Trump’s m’chut’n, while Seryl Kushner (née Stadtmauer), Jared’s mother and Charles’ wife, is the Trump’s m’chutn’steh; together, they are Donald and Melania’s m’chutonim. (BTW: For those who speak/understand Spanish, the word consuegro/consuegra is pretty close  . . . “the father-in-law/mother-in-law of one’s son or daughter.”). In issuing a pardon to his m’chutan just days before he (please G-d) heads for the exit, Donald Trump has done something which has never happened before in American history and undoubtedly will never happen again.  

Ever since George Washington issued the first presidential pardon in 1795 (forgiving two Pennsylvania men sentenced to death for treason after participating in protests known as "The Whiskey Rebellion”) there have been some forgotten doozies. How many recall that in 1868, Lincoln’s successor, Andrew Johnson, fully pardoned every soldier who fought for the Confederate Army? Or that in 1989, Ronald Reagan pardoned George Steinbrenner, the loud-mouthed owner of the New York Yankees, who had been convicted in 1974 on 14 criminal counts for making illegal financial contributions to Nixon's reelection campaign two years earlier? 

Of course, up until just the other day, President Gerald R. Ford’s pardoning of his predecessor Richard Nixon had been the most notorious such act in all American history. Now mind you, ‘45 isn’t the only president to pardon a family member: Bill Clinton pardoned his half-brother Roger (who had pleaded guilty to cocaine distribution charges and served a year in prison). Roger’s pardon was one of 147 issued by the outgoing president on his very last day in office.  45’s pre-Christmas pardons were far, far more than mere gifts to loyalists such as Roger Stone, Paul Manafort, Michael Flynn and his m’chutan Charles Kushner; they were knockout punches aimed directly at core American principles.  For in addition to these particularly noxious characters, there were three former Republican members of the House of Representatives -  Chris Collins of New York, Duncan Hunter of California and Steve Stockman of Texas — who were guilty of, respectively, insider trading, stealing hundreds of thousands in campaign money and robbing a charity.  These pardons, in the words of columnist/constitutional law professor/professional whistleblower Harry Litman “. . . delivered an especially brutal kick in the teeth to the DOJ.” Generally speaking, in order to receive a presidential pardon, petitioners are supposed to have served their sentences, demonstrated genuine remorse for their crimes and led a productive life afterward. Such requirements are just one more joke to Trump — by a conservative estimate, more than half of his pre-Christmas pardons went to people who did not meet Justice Department criteria.

Ivanka Trump’s billionaire father-in-law Charles Kushner had pleaded guilty in 2004 to 18 counts of tax evasion, witness tampering, and making illegal campaign donations. Moreover, he had confessed to retaliating against his brother-in-law, who was cooperating with federal authorities, by hiring a prostitute to seduce him. He filmed the encounter and sent it to his sister, the man’s wife. Prosecuted by then U.S. Attorney Chris Christie, Kushner served 14 months of a two-year sentence in federal prison.  Christie, who recently referred to Kushner’s crimes as “one of the most loathsome, disgusting crimes that I prosecuted when I was U.S. attorney,” gained enough notoriety and positive publicity that he was eventually elected governor of New Jersey. His involvement in prosecuting the case also got him kicked off the Trump political jet.  I guess what they say is true: קיין גוטע מעשה ווערט נישט באשטראפט (keyn gute meshh vert nisht bashtraft - viz. “No good deed goes unpunished”) Prior to 2016, Charles Kushner was a major donor to Democrats in New York.  Once Donald Trump started his race for the White House, Kushner switched his allegiance - and donations - to the G.O.P.  And yes it is true, he has long been a major contributor to Chabad and other Jewish educational institutions.  

But Roger Stone?  Paul Manafort?  Michael Flynn? Have they shown or voiced any contrition?  What have they done to indicate any rehabilitation?  Former general Michael Flynn, who served about 2 weeks as Donald Trump’s first National Security Advisor, has, of late, been appearing on News Max and OAN urging his former boss to put the country under martial law in order to get the 2020 election overturned!  This is how one earns a presidential pardon?  Or, have the Stones, Manaforts and Flynns done something far more important: put cash into the Trump coffers?  Although there is as yet no hard proof that a crime has been committed by Donald Trump, the history is both clear and ever-present: the man has consistently used his office as a personal ATM. 

There will undoubtedly be more pardons between today and 11:59 a.m. on January 20, 2021.  And who knows, perhaps the  final pardons - which easily could be issued to many Trumps (Donald, Don, Jr., Eric, Ivanka and Jared certainly come to mind) won’t be signed by the man who, up until he left for Mar-a-Lago just other day, sat behind the Resolute Desk . . . but by Mike Pence who may well become “President for a day” just so he can pardon his former boss. Only time will tell.  (BTW: Anyone seeking to purchase a handsome replica of the Resolute Desk, it will set you back $6,118.49.  Ironically, the best venue for purchase is Overstock.com, whose former C.E.O., Patrick Byrne, plays a significant role in the conspiracy to overturn Joe Biden’s victory.  And by the way, the Resolute replica is made not in the United States, but rather Indonesia.)

In pardoning his m’chut’n - another billionaire real estate tycoon who got his start because his father was very, very rich - Donald Trump has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt the truth of two things:

1. דאָס עפּעלע פֿאַלט ניט װײַט פֿון בײמעלע (Dos epele falt nit vayt fun beymele - “The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree,” and

2. When it comes to Donald Trump, the answer to the question “How low can you go?” is נידעריקער ווי די נייַנט קרייַז פון גענעם (nideriker vi di naynt krayz fun genem) . . . “Lower than the ninth circle of hell!”

8 days until the Georgia election;

23 days until Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are inaugurated.

Be safe . . . See you next year!

Copyright©2020 Kurt F. Stone

The Politics of Pandemics: a Primer

                                    The Black Death Hits Venice

In October, 1347, the Black Death, a variant of bubonic plague, arrived in Europe and began killing about half the population, thus changing the social order and transforming the European continent forevermore. Although it was no means the world’s first pandemic, it did carry with it the most memorable of all history's fatal taglines: “The Black Death.”

Despite being largely discredited by the vast majority of medical historians like the Swiss-born Iris Ritzmann, millions of central Europeans fervently believed that Jews were to blame for the plague, and as such gruesomely killed them off by the hundreds of thousands. Hey, if you’ve got to blame someone for being the cause of an otherwise inexplicable disease which wound up killing off more than 200 million men, women and children, why not make it the Jews?

The first of history’s horrific pandemics was known as The Plague of Justinian (541 C.E.). It was caused by a single bacterium known as Yersinia pestis, and hung around most of the inhabited world for more than a thousand years. The Plague of Justinian arrived in Constantinople, the capital of the Byzantine Empire, in 541 CE. It was then carried over the Mediterranean Sea from Egypt, a recently conquered land paying tribute to Emperor Justinian in grain. Plague-ridden fleas hitched a ride on the black rats that snacked on the grain. This plague decimated Constantinople and spread like wildfire across Europe, Asia, North Africa and Arabia killing an estimated 30 to 50 million people, perhaps half the world’s population.

When the Black Death finally made its way to Venice in 1347 the Doges (city fathers), although possessing no scientific understanding of contagion, were able to fathom that it had something to do with proximity. As a result, forward-thinking officials in the Venetian-controlled port city of Ragusa (Dubrovnik) decided to keep newly arrived sailors in isolation until they could prove they weren’t sick. At first, sailors were held on their ships for 30 days, which became known in Venetian law as a trentino. As time went on, the Venetians increased the forced isolation to 40 days or a quarantino, the origin of the word “quarantine,” and the start of its practice in the Western world.

In England, the Black Death kept popping up every decade from 1348 and 1665; each decade found nearly 20% of the population succumbing to this plague. Then there was smallpox, which wiped out entire populations in Mexico, North Africa and parts of Asia. In 1801. British doctor Edward Jenner famously inoculated his gardener’s 9-year-old son with cowpox and then exposed him to the smallpox virus with no ill effect. Jenner’s vaccine was right on the money, but wouldn’t totally eradicate the disease until 1980.

The 1918-1920 “Spanish Flu,” the deadliest in history, infected an estimated 500 million people worldwide —about one-third of the planet’s population—and killed an estimated 20 million to 50 million men, women and children, including some 675,000 Americans. Here in the United States there were 2 waves; the first wasn’t nearly as lethal as the second, which saw the Wilson administration ordering U.S. citizens to wear masks, close and shutter schools, theaters and businesses; bodies piled up in makeshift morgues before the virus ended its deadly global march. There is little evidence that people declared these steps to be illegal obstacles to freedom . . . unlike what we see and hear today during our current COVID-19 crisis.

In brief, the history of pandemics has shown progress on many fronts including the superstitious, the social, the scientific and today, something rather new: the political. The progress with which biochemists, epidemiologists and infectious disease specialists have created, tested and vetted innumerable vaccines (two of which have just this past week received FDA emergency approval) is nothing short of the miraculous. In my work with the medical and scientific experts at Advarra (for which, by law, our primary mandate is to protect the rights and safety of participants in clinical trials), it has never ceased to amaze me how much distance there is between pharmaceuticals, procedures and just plain politics. From our side of the aisle, it has been both deeply tragic and utterly laughable to observe the countless roadblocks and phantasmagoric pronouncements of politicians who haven’t got the slightest idea of what they’re talking about. They have placed an altogether psychotic roadblock on the pathway to cure.

More and more, we read or hear the declarations of so-called community leaders who aver that COVID-19 is a “hoax” nefariously created and funded by the likes of the late Hugo Chavez, Bill Gates and George Soros; that vaccines created by the likes of Pfizer and Moderna have not been created to stem the tide of the COVID-19 pandemic but rather to implant microchips into those receiving vaccinations for the express purpose of tracking every human being on the planet. Further, these same people claim that the wearing of masks, observing social distancing and other sensible precautions represent nothing less than the death of liberty.

Then there are those who are scaring the daylights out of people by telling them that these vaccines are purposefully made to inflict lethal harm, not healing.

A couple of examples might be useful. Just the other day, Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro criticized Pfizer, bizarrely warning that their BioNTech vaccine could result in such strange side-effects as women growing beards and people turning into crocodiles. He also announced that under no circumstances would he submit to being vaccinated.  And by the way, Bolsonaro is one of the autocrats that our current POTUS most admires.

Closer to home, just this past Friday, Representative Ken Buck (R-CO) told Fox News’ Neil Cavuto that he will not be taking the coronavirus vaccine, explaining that he is “more concerned about the safety of the vaccine” than the “side effects of the disease.” “It is my choice,” Rep. Buck told Cavuto: “I’m an American and I have the freedom to decide if I’m going to take a vaccine or not and, in this case, I’m not going to take the vaccine.” Then there are all those “super spreader” gatherings we see covered on the nightly news in which hardly anyone is wearing a mask or keeping their distance. It seems that for a troubling minority, refusing to wear a mask or keep six-foot distances are marks of all-American machismo or marianismo. (Do note, being a hardcore anti-vaxxer is by no means the exclusive purview of conservative Republicans and political lunatics; If you look at some of the places where opposition to vaccinations for children is highest, it’s places like Santa Monica, Marin County (just across the Golden Gate Bridge) and Seattle, none of which are part of the right wing.

Here in Florida (which, with a few exceptions is the reddest part of the Deep South)-, Governor Ron DeSantis (a.k.a. in umbra Trump (Latin for “In the Shadow of Trump”) has made it next to impossible for counties or municipalities to initiate their own pro-mask, pro-social distancing ordinances and has further mandated that restaurants, bars, gyms, nail parlors and other such businesses remain open so as not to interfere with the state’s supposedly reemerging economy. (It should be noted that DeSantis is giving serious thought to running for POTUS in 2024 should his revered leader not. As such, he is doing everything in his power to keep on the good side of Trump’s right-wing, Libertarian base.) DeSantis has also managed to distort both COVID-19 and COD (Cause of Death) stats so as to make it seem that deaths attributable to the pandemic are much lower than the more trustworthy stats provided by the Johns Hopkins Corona Virus Resource Center.

While the scientific/medical progress made in the pursuit of corralling COVID-19 has been nothing short of a breathtaking miracle, the politics behind it all have been as terrifying as any Wes Craven-directed slasher film. On the science/medical side of the pandemic, researchers and ethicists have done their jobs with tireless alacrity, going through tens of dozens of clinical trials in order to develop vaccines which are both relatively safe and more than reasonably effective. Are these vaccines perfect? No . . . no drug, vaccine or medical procedure is 100% safe. There is always the possibility of “adverse events” (side effects) depending on a host of issues like “comorbidities” (other medical conditions like HIV, diabetes, immune system deficits or advanced age). And of course, any medicine or vaccine must by law include the majority of these possible known side effects. Anyone who has ever watched drug ads on television knows that the majority of a 60-second spot is consumed with telling you all the possible things that could go wrong. Although both the legal and ethical thing to do, it’s nonetheless enough to keep many people from telling their physician to try the drug - although why a patient should be telling the doctor what to try has always seemed to me a bit like putting the cart before the horse.

Knowing that I have been working on COVID-19 protocols for most of 2020 (along with the “Beau Biden Cancer Moonshot Project” for the past 5), I am frequently asked if I will be taking one of the various anti-COVID-19 vaccines. “Yes, yes, a thousand times yes,” I tell them. “I will be doing it for me, for my family and friends, my students, neighbors, coworkers and congregants . . . for anyone and everyone I may come into contact with.”

I always conclude my answer with: “And always remember:  the acronym for “United States” is “U.S.,” as in “us.”

We are all in this together.

15 days until the Georgia Senate elections

30 days until the beginning of the Biden/Harris administration.

Copyright©2020 Kurt F. Stone

Where’s Smedley Now That We Need Him?

Back in 1852, Karl Marx published an essay entitled The 18th Brumaire of Louis Napoleon. The genesis for this brief essay was an event which occurred on December 2 1851 when followers of French President Louis Bonaparte (Napoleon's nephew) broke up the Legislative Assembly and established a dictatorship. A year later, Louis Bonaparte proclaimed himself Emperor Napoleon III.

    General Smedley Darlington Butler (1881-1940)

In this minor - though fascinating - work Marx traced how the conflict of different social interests manifests itself in the complex web of political struggles. In other words, as is stated in the Hebrew Bible (Koheleth [Ecclesiastes] 1:9), ““There’s nothing new under the sun.”

Unquestionably, the most famous (though frequently misquoted) statement found in The 18th Brumaire is still regarded as one heck of a truism even during the waning days of the Trump Presidency in 2020: that historical entities appear twice, "the first as tragedy, then as farce." Marx, of course, knew nothing of Donald Trump the man; he did, however, know tons and tons about autocrats like Donald Trump. In the 18th Brumaire, Marx was aiming his pen at - respectively - Napoleon I and then to his nephew Louis Napoleon (Napoleon III).

The haunting truth of Marx’s old chestnut came to mind yesterday, when SCOTUS (the Supreme Court of the United States) gave the shortest of shrifts to Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s legal brief (along with amicus briefs from 17 other states’ attorneys general and a majority of Congressional Republicans) to overturn - and thus invalidate - the 2020 presidential election. This legal kick in the privates came just days after the Roberts’ Court took all of one sentence to tell Trump et al to take a long hike on a short pier in their case against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Ever since it has been understood that former Vice President Joseph R. Biden, Jr., and Senator Kamala Harris will be the next President and Vice President of the United States of America, Donald Trump and his [il[legal team have filed more than 4 dozen cases in state and federal courts, seeking to have the 2020 presidential election overturned.  Their batting average has been near zero.  For this we can offer prayers of thanksgiving to the American judiciary which, for the most part, refuse to be drawn into any conspiratorial coup.  Come tomorrow, December 14, the 2020 presidential election will have become part of American history; Donald Trump will be a loser,  Joseph Biden a winner and the attempted coup will begin melting into the scummy slag of history. 

“So where,” you may well ask, “is the tragedy and the farce?”  The farce, to put second things first, is the attempted coup created by Donald Trump, his autocratic billionaire buddies, a gaggle of different Nationalist, Racist, White Supremacist, uber-libertarian and conspiratorial groups; and all those who wish nothing more than to  dismantle virtually everything ever done or dreamed by former President Barack Obama and his administration. These coup-masters are a frightening cult made up of folks who disdain Ivy League graduates, progressives, immigrants, scientists, most Jews, environmentalists and feminists; they are, for the most part, made up of all those Second Amendment-loving Americans who seek a return to the days of the Cold War when political correctness was unheard of, Ozzie And Harriet were the typical American family, and moms stayed at home in order to raise a family.  It is a “farce,” precisely because it is a misguided dream of yesteryear.  

So far as “tragedy” goes, let’s hop into the “Wayback Machine” and alight on the earliest days of the FDR administration. Shortly after his inauguration in March, 1933, a group of the wealthiest men in America started putting together and funding a campaign which they hoped and prayed would punish - and eventually remove from office - the most aristocratic of all American presidents. Their reason?  Because, as the most blue-blooded member of the Mayflower-Groton-Harvard-patrician breed, he turned out to be very much on the side of the working middle class; a progressive with deep ties to the Jewish/immigrant/rural community. To his classmates and club mates, he became nothing short of an anathema – a traitor to his class and culture. And that is why that group made up of the richest of the American rich sought to overthrow him through a coup in early 1933. They were also deeply afraid that he might raise their taxes. Although not necessarily widely reported in history texts, this group was at the epicenter of what historians have called either “The Business Plot,” or “The Wall Street Putsch.”

It was a dangerous time in America . . . much like the times we have been living through of late. Then along came FDR who soundly thrashed incumbent President Hoover in the 1932 election and then embarked upon an ambitious legislative program aimed at easing some of the troubles. But he faced vitriolic opposition from both sides of the political spectrum. During FDR’s historic “first hundred days,” West Virginia Republican Senator Henry Hatfield (a member of the “Hatfields v McCoys” clan) worriedly wrote a colleague that:  "This is despotism, this is tyranny, this is the annihilation of liberty. The ordinary American is thus reduced to the status of a robot. The president has not merely signed the death warrant of capitalism, but has ordained the mutilation of the Constitution, unless the friends of liberty, regardless of party, band themselves together to regain their lost freedom."

Times were extraordinarily tense.  According to historian Sally Denton in her excellent 2012 book The Plots Against the President, “. . . fascism, communism, even Nazism seemed like possible solutions to the country's ills. . . . Some people even called for a dictator to pull America out of the Great Depression.”  In addition to the bankers who underwrote the “putsch” (one of whom, Brown Brothers/Harriman partner Prescott Bush would eventually become a U.S. Senator from Connecticut and the father of future President George H.W. Bush) thought that they could convince Roosevelt to relinquish power to a basically fascist, military-type government.  It was, in the words of historian Denton, “a cockamamie concept.” The conspirators had several million dollars (and this was in 1933!), a stockpile of weapons and had even reached out to a retired Marine general, Smedley Darlington Butler, to lead their forces.

Smedley Darlington who?  General Butler (nicknamed “Old Gimlet Eye” due to his feverish, bloodshot eyes) was, in 1933, the most highly decorated Marine in American history - the only one to be awarded the Brevet Medal (awarded for “Extreme gallantry and risk of life in actual combat with an armed enemy force”) and two Medals of Honor, all for separate actions. Following “The Great War,” Butler quickly became a household name in America. People trusted him; his name and fame were right up there with Charles Lindbergh and General John J. Pershing. Butler would meet on quite a few occasions with the principles of this plot - including the aforementioned Prescott Bush, bond salesman extraordinaire Gerald MacGuire, Bob Doyle of the American Legion, members of the DuPont family and Singer Sewing Machine heir Robert Sterling Clark.  Their topic was, of course about overthrowing FDR and instituting a Fascist form of government. They then sent Butler out across the country, making speech after speech about the absolute necessity of getting rid of Roosevelt and his band of “communists, socialists, Jewish Marxists and anti-capitalists.”  They would eventually coalesce into “The America First” committee

But somewhere along the way, Butler became convinced that these bankers, heirs and white-shoe, blue-blooded Wall Street attorneys represented a vile danger to our form of government. When he finally got around to asking bond-broker MacGuire what specifically was wanted of him from the group, Butler was told he would be the ideal leader of a vast army of veterans, promising him an army of 500,000 men and all but limitless financial backing, so long as he would be willing to lead a march on the White House to displace Roosevelt.

With time, General Butler moved further and further to the political left, and actually became so anti war that he picked up a new nickname: “The Fighting Quaker.” Finally, unable to remain a part of the crowd of conspirators - let alone leading an anti-Democratic, anti-Semitic putsch - Butler decided he had to do something about it.  But who, he thought, would ever believe what he  had to report?  It was such an outlandish plot as to sound like a story-line from Mark Twain at his fabulist best. Increasingly troubled by MacGuire’s plans, Butler knew he would need someone to corroborate his story if he was going to stop the intended coup. Having previously worked as a police captain in Philadelphia, Butler reached out to a reporter from the Philadelphia Record named Paul Comly French, who agreed to meet with MacGuire as well.  (French, by the way, had gained fame for covering the Lindbergh baby kidnapping - one of the most sensational stories of the early 1930s). During this meeting, MacGuire told French that he believed a fascist state was the only answer for America, and that Smedley Butler was the “ideal leader” because he “could organize one million men overnight.”

Armed with French’s mutual testimony, Butler appeared before the McCormack-Dickstein congressional committee, also known as the Special Committee on Un-American Activities, to reveal what he knew about the plot to seize the presidency in November 1934. (The committee’s co-chairs were Massachusetts Democrat John McCormick [1891-1980], an Irish Catholic who would serve as Speaker of the House from 1962-1971 and New York Democrat Sam Dickstein [1885-1954], the Lithuanian-born son of an Orthodox rabbi who would eventually serve 9 years as a Justice of the New York Supreme Court.  The two men did not get along with one another at all.  Whenever McCormack wielded the gavel, Dickstein absented himself; whenever Dickstein led the committee, McCormack was nowhere to be seen.)  

Listening to General Butler, along with the testimony of both French, and the erratic MacGuire, the committee began to further investigate the plot. The final reports of the committee sang a different tune, finding that all of Butler’s claims could be corroborated as factual. However, they also stressed that the plot was far from being enacted, and it was not clear if the plans would have ever truly come to fruition.

Quickly becoming known as the “White House Coup” and the “Wall Street Putsch,” many major news sources derided Butler’s claims, as the committee’s final report was not made available publicly. Those implicated, ranging from the DuPont family to Prescott Bush, laughed off Butler’s claims; they believed that they were “above the law.” Evidence of the validity of Butler’s testimony was not released until the 21st century, when the committee’s papers were published in the Public Domain. No one was ever prosecuted in connection with the plot.  And yet, without General Butler, there is every reason to believe that some sort of coup would have occurred and likely succeeded.  When America needed what today we would refer to as a “whistle blower,” Smedley D. Butler was there, doing what he did best: being a hero.  (BTW: General Butler wrote a brief book in 1935 [still in print] that for years, was taught in American public schools: War is a Racket.  It is one of the most profound antiwar essays in all American history.

Despite the fact that Donald Trump will no longer be occupying the White House after this coming January 20, (fingers crossed, lucky Dodger socks pulled tight), he is likely not going to be leaving the American political scene.  He and his henchmen (which include Ivanka, Jared, Eric and Donald, Jr.) have already amassed more than a quarter-of-a-billion dollars in their own PAC - ostensibly to keep paying their attorney fees for cases they cannot win . . . let alone get on any court’s docket.  Mostly, the money will be used to fund the Trump lifestyle as well as keeping him on the campaign circuit supporting those who bow before him and destroying those who have seen through or had the chutzpah to criticize him.  He is by no means finished with his task of destroying America while selling the Trump brand and - who knows - creating his own media empire.  There are dire consequences for both America and indeed, the world - in having an unhinged, amoral narcissist go unchallenged.  The fact that a clear majority of all elected Republicans are either incapable of - or afraid to - stand up like Smedley Butler and tell the truth about this miscreant from Manhattan (actually Queens) is both a curse and a stain on the fabric of civil society.

To all those Senate Republicans who are hinting that they won’t be holding hearings for any of Joe Biden’s Cabinet nominees until they are 100% convinced that Trump’s loss wasn’t a case of fraud (i.e. never), I have one thing to say: don’t ever refer to yourself a patriot. You are cultists driven to do whatever your dictatorial master commands - even if it will bring down the American political system. You actually see no danger in declaring the next POTUS illegitimate in the eyes of nearly half the American people. Do you have any idea of how foolish and robotically puerile you look to the rest of the world? Are you that feverishly  fearful of Donald Trump that you would eviscerate the body politic in the hopes that he won’t find someone to challenge you in the next Republican primary?  Where is your spine?

And so, permit me to issue a call for any and all true American patriots (in the real sense of the word) to step into the shoes of General Smedley D. Butler and tell it like it is.

Goodness knows, we need each and every one of you. NOW!

23 days until the Georgia elections.

38 days until the Biden/Harris administration gets to work.

Here’s wishing our Jewish friends a chag chanukah s’maycha! May your latkes (and/or sufgan’yot be delicious and calorie-free . . . And do remember: this is the season for miracles!

Copyright©2020 Kurt F. Stone

Of Soiled Doves and Yiddishe Nazis

155 years ago today (December 6, 1865), the 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution became the law of the land. Simply stated, it formally abolished slavery. It provided that "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction." Without question, its enactment has long been a high point in American history. All it took was a war between the North and South which nearly wrecked a nation and cost more than 600,000 deaths. Sadly, there are still those who, despite being unable to identify precisely what the Constitution’s 13th Amendment outlaws, act as if it never came into existence. Sadly, the words of Irish statesman Edmund Burke (or Winston Churchill or Spanish Philosopher George Santayana) still ring true: “Those who don’t learn history are doomed to repeat it.”

I begin this week’s post in this manner because today, the 6th of December 2020, Colorado Governor Jared Polis chose to recognize this anniversary on his Facebook page. Governor Polis, who is a friend of mine (I wrote a lengthy biographic essay of him in my 2010 work The Jews of Capitol Hill), reprinted the Amendment’s 32 words and succinctly noted that “With these words, the single greatest change wrought by the Civil War was officially noted in the Constitution.” Unsurprisingly, the Governor’s post received as many nasty putdowns as warm-hearted accolades. One nasty respondent wrote: “Great post, Jared. Now maybe you should read the parts about Freedom of Religion and the Freedom to Bear Arms. Might do you good to brush up on the First, Second, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments considering you've violated all of those being the good little Nazi that you are.”  

I rarely answer these Facebook tirades; responding to the diatribes of moral/political albinos is not my idea of a great way to spend a Sunday afternoon.  In this case, however, I made an exception due to both my anger and disbelief.  I wrote back to this fellow “I cannot imagine anything more vile or less civil than accusing a practicing Jew of being a Nazi. Shame on you, Mr. . . .” Thank G-d my response elicited dozens upon dozens of replies which backed up my pique, and agreed with my analysis. Another civic cretin stated with great certainty that Governor Polis was nothing short of being a communist conspirator being paid by George Soros!  (It should be noted that Jared, who along with his family founded such online behemoths as Pro Flowers and Blue Mountain Greeting cards is easily worth more than $300 million.) To this right-wing automaton I wrote “What planet do you come from? Do you really, truly believe the tripe you just posted?”  My response received lots and lots of “thumbs up” and heart emojis.  Nonetheless, despite all these very supportive reactions, I still found myself burning up inside.

Another online thread has been going on and on about President-Elect Biden’s having suffered a broken foot while playing with one of his future “first dogs.”  Through a bit of simple photoshopping, there are tons of pictures of him wearing a boot on either his right or left foot - which leads hundreds of thousands of cyber simpletons to conclude that he is either: a) faking it, or b) “a moron who needs his filthy wh*re of a wife to label his shoes right foot or left foot because he is both feeble and stupid.”  To this one, who turned out to be so utterly simpleminded as to get my obvious sarcasm, I wrote: “I never knew these things about the Bidens.  Please, could you provide me with the link to this information so I can share it with my online posse?”  Of course, I never received a reply . . .

Dr. Jill Biden a strumpet? (or “soiled dove,” “victim of frail sisterhood,” “pavement princess” “demimondane” or “skank” - there are tons of synonyms); The President-Elect a mental midget?  Governor Polis a Nazi?  Where in the world do so many people come up with such noxious tripe?  Do they really, truly believe that Dr. Biden is a woman of loose morals but that Melania Trump is a vestal virgin?  Do they really truly believe that “According to everyone in Joe Biden’s law school class, he was the dumbest student at the school” but that  “Donald Trump is a genius!” or that “QAnon people are true patriots,” but that Jared Polis is “a murderous Nazi?” Also, which would be worse? That they really, truly do believe these things or that they do not? What kind of world do they wish to live in? One in which assailing, threatening and browbeating those who have different backgrounds constitutes the gold (or in this case, the pyrite) standard of society? One in which fear is the fuel and ignorance the ideal? How did we ever wind up with so many cynical, shallow and utterly graceless citizens?

Over the past several weeks I’ve communicated with an awful lot  of people who I will lovingly refer to as “the political pompom brigade”; folks who, like the Munchkins of Oz, cannot wait to sing out “Ding Dong, the Witch is Dead!” Sorry gang, as much as I share your joy and elation at the elevation of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris and the devolution of Trump and Pence, I do not believe that things are suddenly going to be doing a political 180. There are simply too many politically-charged incendiary devices buried beneath the nation’s surface. Need proof? As of 48 hours ago, there were a mere 27 of 249 Congressional Republicans who had found the courage to publicly admit that Joe Biden actually defeated Donald Trump. According to interviews with all the GOP members of Congress conducted by the Washington Post, two Republicans consider Trump the winner despite all evidence to the contrary. And another 220 GOP members of the House and Senate — about 88 percent of all Republicans serving in Congress — will simply not say who won the election. How shocking; how depressing; they might as well believe that Sandy Koufax was a right-handed reliever for the Yankees! And of course, there are other buried I.E.D.s . . . such as last-minute stacking of the Pentagon and Intel agencies with Trump/Pompeo loyalists . . . to what end, not even the good Lord knows.

And while it is indeed true that Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and those they have named to staff and lead the incoming administration are far more competent, worldly and professional than those we’ve be putting up with these past 4 years, undoing what they have done (or doing what they have undone) isn’t going to happen in the first 100 or even 1,000 days. We’re still going to be dealing with the many interminable roadblocks which have been strewn across the path of progress, not to mention all those who are more than willing to sit on their hands until 2022 or 2024, and the Trump base which will continue believing that the new administration is illegitimate, the first Lady a "soiled dove,” and anyone who disagrees with them a Communist, a Nazi or a  traitor.  

Do keep in mind the (slightly altered) words of Bette Davis in All About Eve: “Fasten on your seatbelts; it’s going to be a bumpy flight.”  

Let’s keep our chins up, our eyes on the prize and our collective energy level at full bore.  Together, we will make it!

29 days until the Senate elections in Georgia;

43 days until the Inauguration. 

Copyright©2020 Kurt F. Stone

Pardon Me?

At the outset, let me be clear: I am not an attorney, never attended law school and didn’t even stay at a Holiday Inn last night. Nonetheless, I do have both a stepson and a son-in-law who are practicing attorneys and did take two challenging courses in Constitutional Law taught by a visiting faculty member of the Harvard Law School. Even after a half-century, I well remember such landmark cases as Marbury v .Madison, McCullough v. Maryland, Schenck v. United States, Plessy v. Ferguson and Schechter v. United States, not to mention the worst decision of all time (with the possible exception of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission) Dred Scott v. John F.A. Sandford. And it is possible - just possible - that before too long, there may be yet another infamous case brought before the nation’s highest court: that of Trump v. United States. The issue? Whether or not it’s legal for the President of the United States to grant him/herself a pardon.

Before getting to the issue at hand and predicting whether or not the outgoing POTUS - along with his family and most loyal toadies -  will, in fact receive pardons, let’s clear up one thing: I for one couldn’t care less whether or not he pardons himself, gets someone else to do it for him, gets Mitch McConnell’s hand-picked Supreme Majority to throw him a legal lifesaver,  or constructs a  piranha-infested moat around 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. No matter how the scenario  plays out, it’s going to ultimately be a lose-lose situation for him and his family.

First things first: according to the U.S. Constitution (article II, Section 2, Clause 1 the president “shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.” While the president’s power to pardon seems unlimited, a presidential pardon can only be issued for a federal crime, and pardons cannot be issued for impeachment cases tried and convicted by Congress. The way things work these days under this particular Department of Justice, Trump enjoys broad immunity from federal probes as president; there are currently no known federal investigations being conducted into possible crimes by him. That could all change at 1:00 on January 20, 2021, when he is no long POTUS. In any event, there are also a minimum of 9 state cases on the drawing board up in New York for which only Governor Andrew Cuomo could issue a pardon. And the way things stand, there are precisely 2 chances of that ever happening: absolutely none and a heck of a lot less than that.

So what choices does Boss Tweet have?

1. Pardon himself. (Trump recently retweeted a post from ultra-out-of-it GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz which said that the he should pardon "everyone from himself, to his administration, to Joe Exotic if he has to.”) From the point of view of legal logic, pardoning himself would be a clear admission that he, Donald Trump, had committed crimes. Let’s face it: one cannot be pardoned for a crime one has not committed. There is precedent for people receiving a presidential pardon even before they have been convicted. But in the case of Donald Trump, he has long insisted that he has never done anything wrong or illegal; it has all been the product of a vast conspiracy created by his enemies in the “lamestream media,” or the entire Democratic Party or all those who are just plain jealous of his success.

2. Another possibility would be for him to his Cabinet to institute the 25th Amendment, thereby having him resign from office, thus turning the presidency over to Mike Pence, thus giving him the constitutional authority to pardon his former boss. One “huuuge” problem with this is that were Pence to pardon Trump, it would thrust a lethal political dagger into the heart of the Hoosier Hero, who has already expressed interest in running for president in 2024. Remember what pardoning Richard Nixon in 1974 did for President Gerald Ford in 1976?

President-elect Joseph Biden has, to date, made it fairly clear that he will not seek to use his Department of Justice to pursue federal investigations about his predecessor.  Whether or not this remains the last word remains to be seen.  It is more than likely that ‘45  still has a few things up his sleeve for his final 50 days in office; these may serve to change the new president’s and his DOD’s mind.  Without question, Biden and Harris are already receiving advice and pressure from a fractionated party as to what they should do.  

According to various anonymous sources within the Trump camp, the president has been seeking advice recently as to whether pardoning himself is even legal in the first place. There was a legal memo written by the Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel just days before Nixon's resignation in 1974 that argued a president could not self-pardon. The DOJ’s position was quite simple: "Under the fundamental rule that no one may be a judge in his own case, it would seem that the question should be answered in the negative." That was, of course, a legal opinion, not law; but much like the opinion that a sitting president can't be charged with a crime, these things take on the feel of precedent. Instead, Nixon's successor and former vice president, Gerald Ford, as previously mentioned, gave his old boss an unconditional pardon a month later, thereby scuttling his own ambition of being elected President of the United States.

Of course, at the moment, Trump’s questions are largely academic (despite the fact that he is likely our least academic president since Warren G. Harding); as mentioned above, he has yet to be charged with a federal crime for which it would take a presidential pardon in order to keep him from being sentenced to living out his years at Club Fed. As things now stand, so long as he is POTUS, there is every reason to believe that he is incapable of being in this position: after all, attorney general, Bill Barr, has made very clear he'd follow existing Department of Justice guidance which prevents a sitting President from being charged with a crime. If Trump gets creative, perhaps he could a try to use a preemptive self-pardon to deal with a potential future federal tax judgment against him. The IRS, for instance, says he incorrectly claimed a $72.9 million tax write-off, according to the New York Times reporting on his tax returns.

But once again, a pardon - whether granted by a succeeding president (like Mike Pence) or the president himself, is, at base, an admission of guilt. And that sort of guilt can neither be lived down nor denied by calling it a hoax. A pardon would make a 2024 presidential redux next to impossible . . . no matter how many apostles still believe he walks on water and makes Abraham Lincoln look like an also-ran.

As I stated at the outset, no matter which path Trump chooses to take, he will find himself in the middle of a lose-lose predicament. Let’s pray for him like the rabbi in Fiddler on the Roof prayed for the Tsar:

May G-d bless and keep Donald Trump . . . far away from us.

36 days until the Georgia election.

51 days until Biden and Harris are inaugurated.

Copyright©2020 Kurt F. Stone